On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Stephen Connolly <[email protected]> wrote: > On 19 October 2010 23:43, Phillip Hellewell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Also, what about my idea that the release plugin ought to just use the >> working copy URL when an scm connection is not defined? Seems like >> that would really simplify things, and I don't see any downsides. >> > > the world does not revolve around svn...we'd have to check _LL_ providers
I see what you mean; asking it to infer not only the URL but also the SCM you're using is probably asking too much. So how about a solution where you still have to tell it the SCM just not the URL, e.g., if the <connection> could be set to like "scm:svn:infer". FYI, on another thread Stephen brought up possibly working on some type of infer functionality. Phillip --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
