On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:57 PM, Phillip Hellewell <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Stephen Connolly > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 19 October 2010 23:43, Phillip Hellewell <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Also, what about my idea that the release plugin ought to just use the >>> working copy URL when an scm connection is not defined? Seems like >>> that would really simplify things, and I don't see any downsides. >>> >> >> the world does not revolve around svn...we'd have to check _LL_ providers > > I see what you mean; asking it to infer not only the URL but also the > SCM you're using is probably asking too much. > > So how about a solution where you still have to tell it the SCM just > not the URL, e.g., if the <connection> could be set to like > "scm:svn:infer". This would make project materialization from a pom impossible. Stephen's addition to the scm plugin makes far more sense. Stephen - Rick Mangi has access to an svn implementation of this and I have a git implementation. Let me know if you want these (I'll have to ask Rick nicely for the svn one). Justin > > FYI, on another thread Stephen brought up possibly working on some > type of infer functionality. > > Phillip > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
