Hi Jason, Thanks for the reply.
In effect then, Plexus lives; at least in terms of developing Mojos. I suppose I thought that the idea was to ultimately de-couple from Plexus. In my perfect world, I'd prefer to leverage JSR-330 knowledge and not have to do with Plexus at all when writing Mojos. There's enough out there to learn without another container, and I think that having to learn Plexus impacts on who writes Mojos. May be in a year or so when M3 is widely adopted, this will be less of a concern. Kind regards, Christopher On 10/11/2010, at 7:45 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > On Nov 10, 2010, at 12:46 AM, Christopher Hunt wrote: > >> Thanks Oliver. >> >> I think that it'll be quite a while before people write MOJOs just for Maven >> 3. From my own perspective having just written two new MOJOs, I'd like to be >> able to write for the future but recognise the present. It'd be great to use >> @inject in my code now and then use the MOJO with Maven 2. Not possible? >> > > Not impossible, but a huge amount of work to get to work in Maven2 and I'm > not aware of anyone doing any work in this area to make JSR-330 work in Maven > 2. But it's definitely within the realm of possibility in Maven 3. >
