On 15 November 2010 13:11, Martin Gainty <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> which version Guice supports qualifier annotations
> @Qualifier
> @Target({ TYPE, METHOD, FIELD })
> @Retention(RUNTIME)
>
https://repository.sonatype.org/content/groups/forge/com/google/inject/guice/
http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/sonatype/sisu/sisu-guice/
> ?
> Martin Gainty
> ______________________________________________
> Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité
>
> Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene
> Empfaenger sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte
> Weiterleitung oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht
> dient lediglich dem Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine
> rechtliche Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von
> E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen.
> Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas le
> destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire
> informez l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie
> de ceci est interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura
> pas n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email
> peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter
> aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni.
>
>
>
>
>
> > From: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Developing MOJOs using JSR-330
> > Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 07:54:14 -0500
> > To: [email protected]
> >
> >
> > On Nov 12, 2010, at 7:44 PM, Christopher Hunt wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jason,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the reply.
> > >
> > > In effect then, Plexus lives; at least in terms of developing Mojos. I
> suppose I thought that the idea was to ultimately de-couple from Plexus.
> > >
> >
> > Plexus the implementation does not live. But with Guice, as Stuart has
> answered, mimics Plexus as there is no feasible way we could just stop
> supporting Plexus. Every plugin, component and configuration would break.
> >
> > > In my perfect world, I'd prefer to leverage JSR-330 knowledge and not
> have to do with Plexus at all when writing Mojos. There's enough out there
> to learn without another container, and I think that having to learn Plexus
> impacts on who writes Mojos.
> >
> > In my perfect world Maven, Nexus, Hudson and M2E plugins will be written
> against JSR-330 so we're on the same page there. We made the changes to the
> underlying systems with your perspective in mind. No one really wants to
> learn N APIs when one will do. But we just can't stop supporting Plexus cold
> turkey, that's just an unworkable situation.
> >
> > Sonatype has been testing the JSR-330 approach in Nexus and Hudson for
> over six months, and we are just introducing it into M2E now. But Maven has
> the more users then any of those systems so it's the one we're moving
> slowest on.
> >
> > >
> > > May be in a year or so when M3 is widely adopted, this will be less of
> a concern.
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Christopher
> > >
> > > On 10/11/2010, at 7:45 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Nov 10, 2010, at 12:46 AM, Christopher Hunt wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Thanks Oliver.
> > >>>
> > >>> I think that it'll be quite a while before people write MOJOs just
> for Maven 3. From my own perspective having just written two new MOJOs, I'd
> like to be able to write for the future but recognise the present. It'd be
> great to use @inject in my code now and then use the MOJO with Maven 2. Not
> possible?
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> Not impossible, but a huge amount of work to get to work in Maven2 and
> I'm not aware of anyone doing any work in this area to make JSR-330 work in
> Maven 2. But it's definitely within the realm of possibility in Maven 3.
> > >>
> > >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jason
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > Jason van Zyl
> > Founder, Apache Maven
> > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > A party which is not afraid of letting culture,
> > business, and welfare go to ruin completely can
> > be omnipotent for a while.
> >
> > -- Jakob Burckhardt
> >
> >
> >
>
>
--
Cheers, Stuart
