On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Grant Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > yeah, I thought the same thing and just checked it before reading your > e-mail. It's in there. Our project is big so I can't fiddle too much with > the parent POM and I don't want to roll my check into the main surefire > report. The custom check is used as an on-demand static code analysis to > identify public methods in our business tier that are missing > security-related annotations. I'd rather override the parent with my > config, not the union I'm getting now. If all else fails I'll create a new > module that doesn't inherit from our standard parent.
You could roll a fresh pom named something else, like static-analysis-pom.xml. And frankenstein enough of it together to just do the checkstyle checks you want. I'd then check that into your CI tool and run it on checkins or nightly. Then not worry about it again. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
