Good idea to roll the second pom file. I like it, thanks! Grant
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Barrie Treloar <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Grant Lewis <[email protected]> > wrote: > > yeah, I thought the same thing and just checked it before reading your > > e-mail. It's in there. Our project is big so I can't fiddle too much with > > the parent POM and I don't want to roll my check into the main surefire > > report. The custom check is used as an on-demand static code analysis to > > identify public methods in our business tier that are missing > > security-related annotations. I'd rather override the parent with my > > config, not the union I'm getting now. If all else fails I'll create a > new > > module that doesn't inherit from our standard parent. > > You could roll a fresh pom named something else, like > static-analysis-pom.xml. > And frankenstein enough of it together to just do the checkstyle > checks you want. > I'd then check that into your CI tool and run it on checkins or nightly. > Then not worry about it again. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
