You can reproduce the issue in https://github.com/debraj-manna/dependency-issue
In dependency tree of delete I am seeing dependency as below [INFO] \- org.apache.bookkeeper:bookkeeper-common:test-jar:tests:4.10.0:test [INFO] +- org.apache.bookkeeper.stats:bookkeeper-stats-api:jar:4.10.0:test [INFO] +- org.apache.bookkeeper:cpu-affinity:jar:4.10.0:test *[INFO] +- io.netty:netty-common:jar:4.1.32.Final:compile* [INFO] +- com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind:jar:2.9.7:compile [INFO] +- com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-annotations:jar:2.9.7:compile [INFO] +- org.jctools:jctools-core:jar:2.1.2:test [INFO] +- org.slf4j:slf4j-api:jar:1.7.25:test [INFO] \- commons-configuration:commons-configuration:jar:1.10:test On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 2:47 AM Nick Stolwijk <nick.stolw...@gmail.com> wrote: > The verbose flag was removed in newer versions of the plugin. You could try > an old pluginversion: > > mvn org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-dependency-plugin:2.10:tree -Dverbose > > With regards, > > Nick Stolwijk > > ~~~ Try to leave this world a little better than you found it and, when > your turn comes to die, you can die happy in feeling that at any rate you > have not wasted your time but have done your best ~~~ > > Lord Baden-Powell > > > On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 7:53 PM Debraj Manna <subharaj.ma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Yes I saw the documentation. It is not behaving as expected. > > > > Can you let me know what is the alternative for maven dependency:tree > > -Dverbose ? If I get the verbose mode for dependency:tree then I think > > that will provide us more information. > > > > On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 6:09 PM Tomo Suzuki <suzt...@google.com.invalid> > > wrote: > > > > > Debraj, > > > > > > I couldn't reproduce the problem in my setting. Netty-common appears as > > > test scope. > > > https://gist.github.com/suztomo/69f854bddd102b3fe83eae8f0720c494 > > > > > > Would you be willing to create a minimum reproducible project? > > > Hopefully it builds only artifacts available on the public Internet (no > > > artifactory.arkin.local:8000). > > > > > > BTW, this is the documentation I think your Maven tree is not behaving > as > > > documented: > > > > > > > > > https://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html#dependency-scope > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 12:40 AM Debraj Manna < > subharaj.ma...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks Andy for replying. > > > > > > > > maven dependency:tree -Dverbose does not seem to work for me. It > gives > > me > > > > the below message > > > > > > > > ... > > > > [INFO] --- maven-dependency-plugin:3.1.1:tree (default-cli) @ delete > > --- > > > > [INFO] Verbose not supported since maven-dependency-plugin 3.0 > > > > [INFO] com.vnera:delete:jar:0.001-SNAPSHOT > > > > ... > > > > > > > > If I just exclude netty-common from apache-bookkeeper then > netty-common > > > > 4.1.32 does not show up in the dependency tree. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 3:57 AM Andy Feldman <an...@wealthfront.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 6:31 AM Debraj Manna < > > subharaj.ma...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > bookkeeper-common is in test scope but still netty-common is > > showing > > > up > > > > > as > > > > > > compile dependency. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is it possible that netty-common is a transitive dependency of > > another > > > > > dependency as well? Running dependency:tree does not show all paths > > to > > > > each > > > > > dependency. > > > > > > > > > > You can try running dependency:tree with the verbose flag to see > more > > > > > branches of the tree, although the documentation says it is not > > > > guaranteed > > > > > to work properly with Maven 3. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-dependency-plugin/tree-mojo.html#verbose > > > > > > > > > > You can also try removing the dependency on bookkeeper-common and > > > running > > > > > dependency:tree again to see if netty-common still shows up. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Andy Feldman > > > > > Wealthfront > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Tomo > > > > > >
