On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 09:36 +0200, Kenney Westerhof wrote: > On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Mykel Alvis wrote: > > Total now $0.04: > > I totally agree, but since Maven 2 already uses directories with the > version in it's name, it should be possible to store the jar itself > without a version in it's name. The path to the jar already has it's > version in it, so you can still differentiate between versions > (but not snapshots..)
Here's my take on it: http://blogs.codehaus.org/projects/maven/archives/001052_why_maven_uses_jar_names_with_versions.html -- jvz. Jason van Zyl jason at maven.org http://maven.apache.org Our achievements speak for themselves. What we have to keep track of are our failures, discouragements and doubts. We tend to forget the past difficulties, the many false starts, and the painful groping. We see our past achievements as the end result of a clean forward thrust, and our present difficulties as signs of decline and decay. -- Eric Hoffer, Reflections on the Human Condition --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
