-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'll add my $0.02:
http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/jdcasey/archives/001053_dependencies_to_version_or_not_to_version.html Cheers, - -john Jason van Zyl wrote: > On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 09:36 +0200, Kenney Westerhof wrote: > >>On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Mykel Alvis wrote: >> >>Total now $0.04: >> >>I totally agree, but since Maven 2 already uses directories with the >>version in it's name, it should be possible to store the jar itself >>without a version in it's name. The path to the jar already has it's >>version in it, so you can still differentiate between versions >>(but not snapshots..) > > > Here's my take on it: > > http://blogs.codehaus.org/projects/maven/archives/001052_why_maven_uses_jar_names_with_versions.html > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCaSa1K3h2CZwO/4URAvXNAKCcqaDKFFbXQMI1CpOIE3muiR8zdgCfRxNg HmLrtnEgcRsyy37U0Ndvz3E= =xp5B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
