take a look at geronimo for a LARGE project using maven.

-----Original Message-----
From: Anil Arora [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 7:03 PM
To: Maven Users List; Brett Porter
Subject: RE: Why I hate Maven :-)


Your counter point of having multiple artifacts per project is still a
little troubling.

I think the example of ejb, taglib, etc. is good when you're thinking
about that level of granularity.  

In our application, we have quite a few files which can be customized by
a customer.  So, it doesn't make sense to archive these in a jar file.
But with the number of artifacts that needs to be in the final
distribution, this method does not scale.

To me, it seems that maven tends to be more suited for applications that
result in few artifacts.  I still would like to see how an application
like Tomcat can be built using maven.  

Anil


-----Original Message-----
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 1:18 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: Why I hate Maven :-)

On 6/14/05, Jim Mochel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brett Porter recently posted a BLOG entry asking why some people hate
> Maven.

Hmmm.. unless I'm mistaken that was last year! Maybe the blog software
decided to send out a refresh :)

Regardless, you make some good points here - thanks for taking the
time to do so. I've spent some time putting together a response, and
have also put it up on the blog as I think it would be of general
interest to people who have read the original post.

http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/brett/archives/001110_re_why_do_you_hat
e_maven.html

Im happy to discuss any of these points further, or examine your SOA
use case in more detail WRT Maven2 if you'd like.

Cheers,
Brett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to