On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 13:27 +0200, Jose Gonzalez Gomez wrote: > Thanks a lot, I'll try to take a look at it as soon as possible. > Anyway, I've been taking a look at the head revision of > org.codehaus.doxia.module.docbook.DocBookParser.java, and I doubt that > this parser is going to generate anything close to useful. I had the > feeling that this class was copied from some other parser (maybe the > xdoc parser, as indicated in the header comment): most of the tags > used there are not part of the Docbook format, and there are some > commonly used tags missing.
It's simplified docbook and is definitely geared toward site documentation, but decent PDFs can be produced. If you have existing tools that work with full docbook I would say stick with them. What's in Doxia is simplified docbook support. -- jvz. Jason van Zyl jason at maven.org http://maven.apache.org People develop abstractions by generalizing from concrete examples. Every attempt to determine the correct abstraction on paper without actually developing a running system is doomed to failure. No one is that smart. A framework is a resuable design, so you develop it by looking at the things it is supposed to be a design of. The more examples you look at, the more general your framework will be. -- Ralph Johnson & Don Roberts, Patterns for Evolving Frameworks --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
