I agree that the problem may be faced, but what about trying it the agile way : 
just putting everything online in a new wiki instance, and waiting a few month 
to see which how it evolves ?

Sebastien (the other one ;-) 

-----Original Message-----
From: Sebastien Arbogast [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 10:31 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: Maven rant

But you won't solve the main issue of a wiki system: information replacement.
I still think that a comment system would be more reliable on the long term.

2006/11/2, Sebastien Brunot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm just joining, but what about creating a wiki with the entire free maven 
> book content so that the (user) community can update it ? I agree to the fact 
> that you need some predefined structure to ensure effective documentation by 
> users / developers. Adding a snipet of documentation should be a "no cost" 
> operation, and having a predefined structure may help to achieve this goal.
>
> Sebastien
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sebastien Arbogast [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 2:45 PM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: Maven rant
>
> 2 thoughts about what you wrote Vincent:
>
> I totally agree on the fact that a few people have to write the core of the 
> documentation before any community effort can be considered.
> But at some point, a PDF and an errata page is not the best way to create a 
> community effort in order to keep this book up-to-date and more accessible.
>
> This leads me to the second point: Maven's wiki doesn't work for the very 
> same reason Cocoon one didn't, for the very same reason I've never seen one 
> good documentation effort based solely on a WIKI: no structure! And that's 
> exactly what your book could be useful as: some sort of a spinal cord on 
> which other content can be aggregated and accumulated over time, and 
> sometimes assimilated on a rewrite.
> Moreover, I don't believe in Wikis at all because instead of adding some 
> information, it just replaces it, even if it keeps some kind of version 
> tracking behind the scenes.
>
> IMHO, Maven documentation should look like that: 
> http://drupal.org/handbooks
>
> 2006/10/31, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sebastien Arbogast [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: mardi 31 octobre 2006 14:18
> > > To: Maven Users List
> > > Subject: Re: Maven rant
> > >
> > > I totally agree but I think that the problem is very difficult to 
> > > solve, especially with all the incredible amount of undeocumented 
> > > features that Maven has. Moreover, the problem is amplified by the 
> > > fact that Maven allows the generation of most of the documentation:
> > > but if you don't write it, it won't write itself, so you will 
> > > endup with dead links everywhere.
> > >
> > > As I see it, the problem in most Open Source projects is that 
> > > developers do that on their free time, and developers aren't writers:
> > > those are two completely different tasks and the second one is not 
> > > the most enjoyable.
> > >
> > > And last but not least: Open Source software is highly evolutive:
> > > why bother write some documentation for a feature that can be 
> > > replaced by something more interesting in no-time and without any 
> > > possible anticipation.
> > >
> > > The thing is that Maven is not the first Maven project I work with 
> > > which faces that very issue. I had exactly the same problems a few 
> > > months ago with Cocoon guys, and my remark is still the same: why 
> > > do project leaders keep on considering documentation as a static thing.
> > > Think of Hibernate or PHP documentation: one base reference book 
> > > with DYNAMIC comments in which people can share their thoughts and 
> > > experiences about each feature/chapter, remarks that can be later 
> > > integrated when the reference is rewritten. The problem is that, 
> > > whereas development itself is a highly-collaborative and efficient 
> > > process, nothing is really done so that documentation writing is 
> > > collaborative enough: no workflow, no direct input, no dynamic 
> > > comments, etc. Think of it: "Better Builds With Maven" is the most 
> > > comprehensive documentation about Maven2. But was it written 
> > > collaboratively? No. And I'm convinced that if it had been, it 
> > > would be much higher quality and much more accessible today.
> >
> > Sebastien, I don't believe this is true. This is the same as any 
> > open source project. It's not the community that creates an open 
> > source project. It's one or two guys (possibly 3 ;-)). Then once 
> > there is a strong kernel developed by these few guys then others 
> > will join and help. The same is true for documentation. You need one or 2 
> > leaders to first write the core of it.
> > This is what we've done with BBWM. Now I agree that a good idea 
> > could be to build on it by opening it up to the community. But don't 
> > believe a single instant that the community will write a good 
> > quality book by itself. BTW there's already a Maven wiki which is 
> > opened to anyone interested. It's been there for more than a year 
> > but I wouldn't call the result comprehensive documentation.
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Vincent
> >
> > > 2006/10/31, dhoffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > >
> > > > Jeff,
> > > >
> > > > I use maven and I really like it and I don't want this to sound 
> > > > like negative criticism but you are right, the learning curve 
> > > > for maven
> > > newbie's
> > > > is huge and there just isn't much good docs available.  I have 
> > > > wound
> > > up
> > > > getting bits of pieces of info from here and there...it just 
> > > > takes so
> > > long.
> > > > It would be great if some maven gurus could solve this problem 
> > > > and
> > > make
> > > > maven more accessible.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Jeff Mutonho wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Is maven in the process of unintentionally killing itself due 
> > > > > to
> > > poor
> > > > > support and documentation?I may be wrong but I strongly feel 
> > > > > that
> > > the
> > > > > poor support and documentation is hampering adoption of an
> > > otherwise
> > > > > brilliant tool.It always seems like the participation of 
> > > > > plugin developers in answering questions from mere users like 
> > > > > myself is non-existent.Then lets not forget the poor 
> > > > > documentation.The BB
> > > book
> > > > > was an excellent idea ,but sometimes it just does not address
> > > problems
> > > > > users face on the "setup battle field" and the "configuration 
> > > > > trenches" we're all familiar with.I'll give an example that 
> > > > > relates
> > > to
> > > > > my experience.I posted questions relating to problems with the
> > > Maven
> > > > > Wagon plugin and in the process also thought it wise to see 
> > > > > what
> > > the
> > > > > documents say.That led me to http://maven.apache.org/wagon/  
> > > > > and clicking on the Getting Started link I ended up at the URL 
> > > > > http://maven.apache.org/wagon/guides/getting-started/index.htm
> > > > > l
> > > > > ,
> > > and
> > > > > almost every link there leads to a :
> > > > > =========================================================
> > > > > Page Not Found
> > > > > Sorry, the page you requested was not found. This may because:
> > > > >
> > > > >     * The page has moved, was outdated, or has not been created yet
> > > > >     * You typed the address incorrectly
> > > > >     * You following a link from another site that pointed to 
> > > > > this
> > > page.
> > > > >
> > > > > We have recently reorganised our site, so please try looking 
> > > > > in the navigation on the left for the item you are looking for 
> > > > > on Maven
> > > 1.x
> > > > > or the Maven project. For information about Maven 2.0 or 
> > > > > Continuum, please visit their sub sites, available from the 
> > > > > links in the top right of the page. There is no need to report 
> > > > > this broken link to
> > > the
> > > > > Maven team, as errors are periodically monitored and repaired.
> > > > >
> > > > > ==============================================================
> > > > > ==
> > > > > ===
> > > > >
> > > > > Same thing happens with the "Examples" link.Surely this cannot 
> > > > > be a pleasant user experience for anyone , let alone for a 
> > > > > poor newbie
> > > who
> > > > > might think looking at the docs is a good start.In my example, 
> > > > > what then can a user do besides thinking of  putting one's 
> > > > > neck on the guillotine?One gets no help on the mailing list 
> > > > > and the
> > > documentation
> > > > > isn't helpful either.
> > > > > I understand very well the idea that people are busy etc , but 
> > > > > also feel that there's need for more participation  from 
> > > > > plugin authors
> > > in
> > > > > helping mere users like myself and others who get stuck with
> > > problems
> > > > > only the maven gurus can solve...unless of course the plugins 
> > > > > are
> > > only
> > > > > to be used by the authors themselves.
> > > > > Please don't take take this as whining , but rather , as a 
> > > > > personal view and perhaps constructive criticism.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Jeff  Mutonho
> > > > >
> > > > > GoogleTalk : ejbengine
> > > > > Skype        : ejbengine
> > > > > Registered Linux user number 366042
> > > > >
> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > --
> > > > > ---
> > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Maven-rant-
> > > tf2544811s177.html#a7093319
> > > > Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > --
> > > > --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sébastien Arbogast
> > >
> > > http://www.sebastien-arbogast.com
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > --
> > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > __ _____ Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à 
> > toutes vos questions !
> > Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des 
> > internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses 
> > http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Sébastien Arbogast
>
> http://www.sebastien-arbogast.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
Sébastien Arbogast

http://www.sebastien-arbogast.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to