One way of achieving this would be to put the properties files that need
to be filtered in a folder and the non-filtered ones in another folder.
These folders can then be configured for
<filtering>true/false</filtering> accordingly.

Something along the lines of:

<resource>
  <directory>src/main/filtered</directory>
  <filtering>true</filtering>
</resource>
<resource>
  <directory>src/main/unfiltered</directory>
  <filtering>false</filtering>
</resource>

-Olivier

On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 16:21 +0200, Peter Horlock wrote:
> Noone?
> 
> Please, there must be someone able to answer this?!
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Peter
> 
> 2008/7/3 Peter Horlock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to let Maven / the Resource plugin (
> > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-resources-plugin/examples/include-exclude.html
> > )
> >
> > parse my source code to replace {project.version} with the current version
> > of the project as defined in the pom.
> > This works great, but - in JSTL, as well as in OpenLazlo, ${variableName}
> > is also a variable of the language itself -
> > therefore, this leads to collisions - for example, one of our developers
> > used a variable named ${parent} which then was filtered by Maven and booom
> > the code was broken. Yada yada YAda!
> >
> > => Is there a way of telling Maven to JUST filter certain properties? I
> > know I could tell it to just filter certain files,
> > but
> > a) a developer could then STILL use ${parent} as a variable in this very
> > file
> > b) whenever I wanted a new file to be filtered, I would have to add this
> > file to the filter section...
> >
> > Thanks a lot folks,
> >
> > Peter
> >


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to