I personally love JBuilder but it is very pricey.  By JBuilder X they
really worked out most of the kinks.  I tried Eclipse but everything
was too much of a PITA to get working.  Every time I try switching to
another IDE I just keep going back to good 'ole JBuilder.

I've tried the latest JDeveloper and StudioCreator and the latest
versions of both look promising but I end up giving up after wasting
several hours trying to get everything setup the way I need it.  So
I'm sticking with JBuilder until the JSF-enabled IDE's mature a little
more.

Sean

On 2/8/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OptimizeIt was pretty awesome at one point, but I think Borland's
> acquisition also managed to kill it as well.
>
> On 2/8/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Legolas Woodland schrieb:
> > > Hi
> > > just look at
> > > http://blogs.borland.com/davidi/archive/2006/02/08/23013.aspx
> > >
> > > it say that borland is going to sell its IDEs , what will happen next ?
> > > who will buy jdeveloper ?
> > >
> > >
> > All I can say to it is that Borland often has missed the sign of the
> > times since Philip Kahn has went away, this time they missed it one time
> > too much :-(
> >
> > I dont think that the new strategy will pay off, this is the usual
> > Borland we give another direction a try move.
> > The question comes to my mind who will buy the stuff.
> > Well Delphi is interesting for some (Microsoft ?)
> > but the rest? JBuilder not really that interesting anymore given that
> > other IDEs have made significant advancements.
> >
> > Interbase has been dead and forked since ages and probably most
> > Interbase users have moved towards Firebird just for the sake of having
> > a development going on into this product.
> >
> > The only interesting asset is the ongoing works into the Eclipse extensions.
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to