He should definitely take the Trinidad component set for high
performance requirements, with this, you're in the same region as
Struts for performance (probably better - cause if you do it yourself,
you won't get the same optimized state-saving as is implemented in
Trinidad).

regards,

Martin

On 11/15/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, before anyone is falling down the chair because I ask this question.
Here we go. A friend of mine is looking for a struts replacement
framework covering extranet sites.

Well here we go, my experience with jsf in the past is, that it was not
too suitable for extranet, but is a perfect choice for intranet sites.
The reason, higher overhead than plain lean frameworks only covering a
minimalistic approach.

The situation has changed however, facelets give a huge performance
boost due to good caching.
But I lack experience, I know several bigger intranet installations,
but extranet is a fully different beast.

So my question how good does jsf scale nowadays in those cases.
Does anyone have any experience or samples?




--

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Reply via email to