No, I don't. Time for the example app being ported ;)
regards, Martin On 11/16/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
do you have numbers for that "better than struts" ? On 11/16/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > He should definitely take the Trinidad component set for high > performance requirements, with this, you're in the same region as > Struts for performance (probably better - cause if you do it yourself, > you won't get the same optimized state-saving as is implemented in > Trinidad). > > regards, > > Martin > > On 11/15/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, before anyone is falling down the chair because I ask this question. > > Here we go. A friend of mine is looking for a struts replacement > > framework covering extranet sites. > > > > Well here we go, my experience with jsf in the past is, that it was not > > too suitable for extranet, but is a perfect choice for intranet sites. > > The reason, higher overhead than plain lean frameworks only covering a > > minimalistic approach. > > > > The situation has changed however, facelets give a huge performance > > boost due to good caching. > > But I lack experience, I know several bigger intranet installations, > > but extranet is a fully different beast. > > > > So my question how good does jsf scale nowadays in those cases. > > Does anyone have any experience or samples? > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
-- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
