Sure, think about the history before trinidad has come to incubator. It was oracle internal, so they have already used it in their webapps.
Apart from this, the usage of trinidad is emerging, also in some real-world web-apps. cheers, Gerald On 11/16/06, Aneesha Govil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it alright to use Trinidad while it is still in the incubator? Aneesha On 11/16/06, Martin Marinschek < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > He should definitely take the Trinidad component set for high > performance requirements, with this, you're in the same region as > Struts for performance (probably better - cause if you do it yourself, > you won't get the same optimized state-saving as is implemented in > Trinidad). > > regards, > > Martin > > On 11/15/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, before anyone is falling down the chair because I ask this question. > > Here we go. A friend of mine is looking for a struts replacement > > framework covering extranet sites. > > > > Well here we go, my experience with jsf in the past is, that it was not > > too suitable for extranet, but is a perfect choice for intranet sites. > > The reason, higher overhead than plain lean frameworks only covering a > > minimalistic approach. > > > > The situation has changed however, facelets give a huge performance > > boost due to good caching. > > But I lack experience, I know several bigger intranet installations, > > but extranet is a fully different beast. > > > > So my question how good does jsf scale nowadays in those cases. > > Does anyone have any experience or samples? > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >
-- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
