Thanks for responding guys.
Really, no official facelets support? That would explain the taglib.xml
not being bundled. I had wondered about that too. :)
Having been on this mailing list for quite a while, I can tell that many
other users do use facelets with myfaces and tomahawk - which is the big
reason why I'm comfortable converting my application to facelets. It
does involve a few extra steps, and a few things don't work as expected,
but overall it's not a big switch from the user standpoint.
Well thanks for the code, it does seem to work nicely.
Regards,
Jeff Bischoff
Kenneth L Kurz & Associates, Inc.
Andrew Robinson wrote:
> I tried to get MyFaces to support Facelets a while ago, but I think
> the result was something along the line of no tomahawk developers want
> to bother. So, not being a MyFaces developer and not having the
> patience to wait for others to help and me not knowing enough about
> the auto-generation and other aspects of the build process that would
> affect this, I decided to make the jsf-comp version which was very
> easy to get out fast.
>
> We can hope for a kind volunteer of the MyFaces developer team to
> champion facelets support, but until then I guess this will do.
>
> FYI - I am not trying to put down anyone on the MyFaces team
>
> On 2/7/07, Jeff Bischoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hey this tag handler works great!
>>
>> ...So why hasn't it been donated to Tomahawk? :)
>>
>> Or is Tomahawk not supposed to have tag handler classes for some
reason?
>> Andrew? Mike? :)
>>
>> Thanks for writing it!
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jeff Bischoff
>> Kenneth L Kurz & Associates, Inc.
>>
>> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> > Thomas,
>> >
>> > check [1] for more on it (search for updateActionListener),
since you
>> > need a *taghandler*
>> >
>> > -M
>> >
>> > [1]http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Use_Facelets_with_Tomahawk
>> >
>> > On 2/2/07, Thomas Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Hi Aleksandr,
>> >>
>> >> You are right. I do use Facelets. But I can use other t-tags
such as
>> >> <t:commandLink/> <t:selectOneMenu/> etc. in xHtml and they work
well.
>> >> Besides, I have the followings on the top of my files.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >>
>> >> Thomas
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
>> >> xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets";
>> >> xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html";
>> >> xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core";
>> >> xmlns:t="http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk";>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Aleksandr Mazur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hi Thomas,
>> >>
>> >> As I see you are using faceletes. updateActionListener should be
>> >> presented in tomahawk.taglib.xml. Is it?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Best regards,
>> >> Aleksandr
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thomas Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> 02.02.2007 12:14
>> >>
>> >> Please respond to
>> >> "MyFaces Discussion" <[email protected]>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> To MyFaces Discussion <[email protected]>
>> >>
>> >> cc
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Subject Error by using <t:updateActionListener/>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> My code look as follow:
>> >>
>> >> myPage.xHtml
>> >> ***************
>> >> ...
>> >> <t:commandLink
>> >> action="openNewBrowser"
>> >> immediate="true"
>> >> value="Open New Browser"
>> >> target="readMessageWindow">
>> >> <t:updateActionListener property="property"
>> >> value="message"></t:updateActionListener>
>> >> </t:commandLink>
>> >> ...
>> >>
>> >> But I get following error when try to open myPage.xHtml. What's
>> wrong?
>> >>
>> >> <t:updateActionListener> Tag Library supports namespace:
>> >> http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk, but no tag was defined for
name:
>> >> updateActionListener
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >>
>> >> Thomas
>> >> ________________________________
>> > Yahoo! 360° – Bloggen und Leute treffen. Erstellen Sie jetzt Ihre
>> > eigene Seite – kostenlos!.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ________________________________
>> > Yahoo! Messenger - kostenlos* mit Familie und Freunden von PC
zu PC
>> > telefonieren .
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
