That's certainly an option except that the Bridge in MyFaces is
distributed with MyFaces project. Right now the work that I have time
for will be needed for an R.I. This means it'll need to be able to be
distributed independently. That being said, I'm all ok with getting it
developed as part of MyFaces...
Scott
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Scott,
>
> since we have already a protlet bridge here in MyFaces, why not
making
> it a "301 bridge"?
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 6/6/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hey Martin,
>>
>> I am sort of scanning the list but the past few weeks have been
spotty.
>> I'll post back to the list. :) To answer your question,
documentation
>> is totally not there since most of the work I did for Trinidad was
>> running only in a "Proof of Concept" environment similar to the
bridge
>> that will be provided for JSR-301. I don't think this work
currently
>> works with the existing MyFaces bridge.
>>
>> In this proof-of-concept, trinidad works with the following
limitations:
>>
>> 1. Some of the popup support does not work. I had a JIRA ticket
on this
>> when Trinidad was in incubator but I haven't checked to see if it's
>> still there. I'll check it out.
>> 2. The javascript libraries are not namespaced meaning two trinidad
>> portlets on the screen at the same time may conflict. Again, I
had a
>> JIRA ticket on this and I'll check the current status.
>> 3. PPR in Trinidad has been disabled in a portal environment.
Things
>> that would normally do a ppr, will do a full-page submit instead
>>
>> Other then that, everything including FileUploads should work.
>>
>> Now I notices in the past month or so there has been much
interest in
>> fully supporting Trinidad in a Portlet environment. It's almost
there
>> but the biggest hurdle we have is the lack of a JSR-301 compliant
bridge
>> (or something that comes close). Some of the preliminary drafts
of the
>> spec have been released, but the Project is still looking for a
home to
>> host its R.I. Is this something people would be interrested in
doing as
>> part of MyFaces or the Bridges project? If so, how do we start the
>> process?
>>
>> Scott O'Bryan
>>
>> Martin Marinschek wrote:
>> > Hi Scott,
>> >
>> > a while ago, I sent the inlined mail to the MyFaces user list -
I'm
>> > sending it to you personally now, as I thought that maybe you
are not
>> > scanning the list, and therefore missed it. I don't want to
bother you
>> > too much - but even a small pointer to any documentation on
this would
>> > be very helpful...
>> >
>> > regards,
>> >
>> > Martin
>> >
>> > -------------
>> >
>> > Hi *,
>> >
>> > I have skimmed through the online documentation for Trinidad, but
>> > haven't found anything useful about portlet compatibility. Is
there
>> > anyone in the Trinidad team who knows more about using portlets
with
>> > Trinidad, and can provide a link to more information?
>> >
>> > Especially I would be interested in:
>> >
>> > - file-upload - how's that handled in portlets?
>> > - including the script/style-elements in the header of the page
>> > (obviously, tr:document won't help in a portlet environment,
right?)
>> > - serving out resources with the resources servlet/filter (it's
clear
>> > that neither one will work in a portlet environment)
>> >
>> > I've heard about some jsf-portlet-bridge helping out here, but
that's
>> > RI, right?
>> >
>> > regards,
>> >
>> > Martin
>>
>>
>
>
