instead of supplying two taglib-files... just create two jar-files with nothing more in it, than the two taglib files... Then the deployment of the two jar-files is enough, whereas the deployment of the two taglib-files requires additional work from the user... regards Alexander
________________________________ From: Wolf Benz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 11:56 AM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: [Tomahawk] facelets I talked about this with Werner Punz... I thought: why not putting this file right away in the meta-inf of the Tomahawk jar? Won't harm nobody but will certainly help a lot of people. Although I still subscribe to that idea, he had a point also: MF and facelets are indeed 2 different technologies, better keep the 2 apart. Yet, it's another thing we can';tr forget to set up and currently the file @MF Wiki is indeed to be stitched together manually with is kinda funny (unprofessional). I think there is room for improvement, either in the form of a facelets-integrated download. (so Toma & Sandbox WITH the taglibs in their meta-in dirs) or at least another entry in the download table just for facelets: a link to the jsf-facelts.jar, and 2 links, to the respective taglib files. This, for me, would seem to be its logical place. -Wolf On 7/31/07, Erlend Hamnaberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: does anyone have an updated tomahawk.taglib.xml ? The one at the wiki does not seem updated. Will Myfaces add full facelets support to its custom components? Regards Erlend
