hi, just as additional information - bruno wrote an interesting mail [1] some months ago.
regards, gerhard [1] http://www.nabble.com/-OT--Toys-R-us-Britain-apparently-uses-MyFaces-tt21586978.html http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2009/9/6 Cagatay Civici <[email protected]> > First article is outdated, so not a valid reference to consider now. > > Regarding second article, I disagree with that since every web framework > has some sort of lifecycle to process the request and generate the response, > why is it a problem that JSF has one too. Also session is not specific to > JSF, it's developer's responsibility > to use memory efficiently. > > Finally I suggest you taking a look at JSF 2.0. Here's a good article; > > http://andyschwartz.wordpress.com/2009/07/31/whats-new-in-jsf-2 > > > On Sep 6, 2009, at 2:12 PM, Richard Yee wrote: > > First of all, the blog post is three years old. The article may have had >> some valid points at the time, but the implementations have improved and the >> technology is understood better now. JSF 2.0 also has a lot of new features >> that improve on the weak spots in the previous specs too. >> >> Richard >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Sep 6, 2009, at 5:07 AM, measwel <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >>> Hereby the links: >>> >>> >>> http://debasishg.blogspot.com/2006/09/which-web-framework-do-you-want-to-use.html >>> http://www.thomasknierim.com/108/web-development/jsf-scalability/ >>> >>> Please comment. >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/JSF-scalability-issues--tp25310548p25317142.html >>> Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >
