this is what I find:

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" 
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"; > 
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; 
xmlns:t="http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk";><head> 
     <meta HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;charset=UTF-8" /> 
     <title>Calender test</title></head><body><form id="calendarForm" 
name="calendarForm" method="post" action="/openhd/visit/test.faces" 
enctype="application/x-www-form-urlencoded"> 
 
            <t:inputCalendar id="formWithForceIdTrue" 
monthYearRowClass="yearMonthHeader" weekRowClass="weekHeader" 
popupButtonStyleClass="standard_bold" currentDayCellClass="currentDayCell" 
renderAsPopup="true" popupDateFormat="MM/dd/yyyy" 
forceId="true"></t:inputCalendar><input type="hidden" 
name="calendarForm_SUBMIT" value="1" /><input type="hidden" 
name="javax.faces.ViewState" id="javax.faces.ViewState" 
value="V55ojcOsiPYqj+yDgqneLhx1Q47ts43T/e8Q6J3Yu5zNJF4NKPAeMtwP8CmZ3PqtxnMHusGEUZ7kO57vHJFpIe8Us4WjgXe4"
 /></form></body> 
</html>

anything suspicious?

Ime

--- On Mon, 2/22/10, Richard Yee <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Richard Yee <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Tomahawk not displaying on jsf 2.0
> To: "MyFaces Discussion" <[email protected]>
> Date: Monday, February 22, 2010, 7:11 PM
> Have you viewed the source on your
> 'blank' pages? You should look at the
> source to see if the tags are not getting processed.
> 
> -R
> 
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Jakob Korherr <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
> > You're welcome!
> >
> > Currently the branches for JSF 2.0 are in progress.
> Trinidad already
> > provides an alpha-2 version for JSF 2.0. However
> Tomahawk (and I think also
> > Tobago) does not provide a branch for JSF 2.0 at the
> moment. But there will
> > be one for Tomahawk soon.
> >
> > To get the compatibility information you have to
> browse the
> > http://myfaces.apache.org website. There you will find
> all the information
> > you need.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jakob
> >
> > 2010/2/22 Ime Asangansi <[email protected]>
> >
> > > thanks Jakob,
> > >
> > > I'm new to myfaces and just trying to use
> components that are not in
> > core.
> > > For example, I tried to use a calendar. I went
> through all the stress of
> > > configuring tomahawk for myfaces 2.0 and its not
> working.
> > >
> > > What are the other options? does tobago or
> trinidad support myfaces 2.0.
> > > I must say its a bit difficult to see where this
> compatibility with 2.0
> > is
> > > written.
> > >
> > > Thanks again
> > >
> > > Ime
> > >
> > >
> > > --- On Mon, 2/22/10, Jakob Korherr <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Jakob Korherr <[email protected]>
> > > > Subject: Re: Tomahawk not displaying on jsf
> 2.0
> > > > To: "MyFaces Discussion" <[email protected]>
> > > > Date: Monday, February 22, 2010, 6:39 PM
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > This list is for all user questions about
> MyFaces stuff
> > > > (core, tomahawk,
> > > > trinidad, ext-val, ...).
> > > >
> > > > Are you using Trinidad or Tomahawk? You
> mixed up the
> > > > systems, I guess.
> > > >
> > > > If you're using Tomahawk, I cannot help you
> at the moment,
> > > > because there is
> > > > no working Tomahawk branch for JSF 2.0 yet,
> but there will
> > > > be one soon.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Jakob
> > > >
> > > > 2010/2/22 Ime Asangansi <[email protected]>
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm new here.
> > > > >
> > > > > Firstly, I am wondering if this list is
> for the entire
> > > > myfaces and not only
> > > > > trinidad.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have some issue with using trinidad
> 1.1.9 with
> > > > myfaces 2.0.
> > > > >
> > > > > The inputcalendar tag doesn't render
> and I do not get
> > > > any error messages. i
> > > > > have just tried the esimple xample at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > http://old.nabble.com/-jira--Created:-%28TOMAHAWK-1484%29-t:inputCalendar-as-popup-with-forceId%3D%22false%22-does-not-work-p27406812.html
> > > > >
> > > > > and none of the calendars show.
> > > > >
> > > > > Pls help
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Ime
> > > > >
> > > > > --- On Mon, 2/22/10, baeschtu baeschtu
> <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > From: baeschtu baeschtu <[email protected]>
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [Trinidad] Backing
> Bean Caching
> > > > issue
> > > > > > To: "MyFaces Discussion" <[email protected]>
> > > > > > Date: Monday, February 22, 2010,
> 4:20 PM
> > > > > > thanks a lot Rene, my backing
> bean
> > > > > > was not in request scope, shame on
> me.
> > > > > > :-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2010/2/21 Günther, Rene - Innflow
> AG <[email protected]>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I dont know much about that,
> but your config
> > > > looks
> > > > > > uncommon to me. In our
> > > > > > > current project we got
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > <bean
> id="transactionManager"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> class="org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateTransactionManager">
> > > > > > >       
> <property
> > > > > > name="sessionFactory"
> ref="sessionFactory"/>
> > > > > > >    </bean>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > <bean id="sessionFactory"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> class="org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.annotation.AnnotationSessionFactoryBean">
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >       
> <property
> > > > > > name="dataSource"
> ref="dataSource"/>
> > > > > > >       
> <property
> > > > > > name="configLocation"
> > > > > > >
> value="classpath:hibernate.cfg.xml"/>
> > > > > > >       
> <property
> > > > > > name="hibernateProperties">
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > <value>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> hibernate.dialect=${hibernate.dialect}
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > hibernate.query.substitutions=true
> 'Y', false
> > > > 'N'
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> hibernate.cache.use_second_level_cache=true
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> hibernate.cache.provider_class=org.hibernate.cache.EhCacheProvider
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > </value>
> > > > > > >
> > > > <!-- Turn
> > > > > > batching off for better error
> messages under
> > > > > > > PostgreSQL -->
> > > > > > >
> > > > <!--
> > > > > > hibernate.jdbc.batch_size=0
> -->
> > > > > > >
> > > > </property>
> > > > > > >    </bean>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But maybe that doesn’t help
> you at all :)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cheers
> > > > > > > Rene
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche
> Nachricht-----
> > > > > > > Von: baeschtu baeschtu
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 21.
> Februar 2010 17:21
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > An: MyFaces Discussion
> > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [Trinidad]
> Backing Bean Caching
> > > > issue
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I finally got the custom
> > > > OpenSessionInViewFilter to
> > > > > > work and I could
> > > > > > > make sure getSession() and
> closeSession()
> > > > are called.
> > > > > > > When debugging my app to
> figure out why my
> > > > call to the
> > > > > > backing bean is
> > > > > > > cached I've seen that the
> class
> > > > Cglib2AopProxy is
> > > > > > involved.
> > > > > > > So I guess my transaction
> handling is
> > > > wrong.
> > > > > > > I use <tx:advice ..>,
> > > > <aop:config> for my
> > > > > > service beans and tried to
> > > > > > > apply this config also to my
> dao beans.
> > > > (don't know if
> > > > > > this is
> > > > > > > necessary) but still the same
> problem.
> > > > > > > I also have this
> > > > > > >    <bean
> > > > id="transactionManager"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> class="org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateTransactionManager">
> > > > > > >       
> <property
> > > > > > name="sessionFactory"
> ref="sessionFactory" />
> > > > > > >       
> <property
> > > > > > name="dataSource" ref="dataSource"
> />
> > > > > > >    </bean>
> > > > > > > in my config.
> > > > > > > I may be on the wrong path..
> can someone
> > > > give me a
> > > > > > hint in the right
> > > > > > > direction?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > thanks
> > > > > > > Bastian
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2010/2/18 "Günther, Rene -
> Innflow AG"
> > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  Sorry, I am always
> using
> > > > OpenSessionInViewFilter
> > > > > > but I dont know that
> > > > > > >> error
> > > > > > >> and I never used
> Trinidad.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Cheers
> > > > > > >> Rene
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> -----Ursprüngliche
> Nachricht-----
> > > > > > >> Von: baeschtu baeschtu
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > > > >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17.
> Februar 2010
> > > > 21:21
> > > > > > >> An: MyFaces Discussion

> > > > > > >> Betreff: Re: [Trinidad]
> Backing Bean
> > > > Caching
> > > > > > issue
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> >> Also what
> session pattern do
> > > > you use?
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Hibernate_And_MyFaces<
> > > > > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/
> > > > > > >>
> myfaces/Hibernate_And_MyFaces>
> > > > > > >> Yes, this may be the
> missing part!
> > > > > > >> I tried "One Session per
> Request via
> > > > Servlet
> > > > > > Filters" but when it comes to
> > > > > > >> extend the
> OpenSessionInViewFilter I got
> > > > a
> > > > > > >> "The hierarchy of the
> type
> > > > OpenSessionInViewFilter
> > > > > > is inconsistent"
> > > > > > >> Which session pattern do
> you recommand
> > > > for myfaces
> > > > > > trinidad 1.2.5 with
> > > > > > >> spring 2.5.6.SEC01 and
> hibernate
> > > > 3.3.2.GA <http://3.3.2.ga/>.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> thanks
> > > > > > >> Bastian
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> PS: I checked that the
> entity is written
> > > > to
> > > > > > mysql.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> 2010/2/17 "Günther, Rene
> - Innflow AG"
> > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > Like Jakob asked
> already: Are you
> > > > sure your
> > > > > > entity is saved in your
> > > > > > >> > database?
> > > > > > >> > After adding the
> object from your
> > > > "add
> > > > > > object" - page can you look into
> > > > > > >> the
> > > > > > >> > table directly. Eg.
> if you use
> > > > MySQL you
> > > > > > could check in the MySQL query
> > > > > > >> > browser.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Also what session
> pattern do you
> > > > use?
> > > > > > >> > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Hibernate_And_MyFaces
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Cheers
> > > > > > >> > Rene
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > -----Ursprüngliche
> Nachricht-----
> > > > > > >> > Von: baeschtu
> baeschtu [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > > > >> > Gesendet: Mittwoch,
> 17. Februar
> > > > 2010 11:43
> > > > > > >> > An: MyFaces
> Discussion
> > > > > > >> > Betreff: Re:
> [Trinidad] Backing
> > > > Bean Caching
> > > > > > issue
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > I tried
> query.setCacheable(false);
> > > > in my dao
> > > > > > but no change.
> > > > > > >> > But also when I try
> to add the
> > > > second record,
> > > > > > I get a:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > org.hibernate.NonUniqueObjectException: a
> > > > > > different object with the same
> > > > > > >> > identifier value was
> already
> > > > associated with
> > > > > > the session:
> > > > > > >> > What confuses me, It
> works with an
> > > > other
> > > > > > entity which is implemented the
> > > > > > >> > same way.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > 2010/2/17 Jakob
> Korherr <[email protected]>
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > > Hi,
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > It seems to me
> like a
> > > > hibernate problem.
> > > > > > Are you sure your entitiy is
> > > > > > >> > saved
> > > > > > >> > > in your
> database? Are you
> > > > refreshing the
> > > > > > entities from the database
> > > > > > >> each
> > > > > > >> > > time you call
> getEntities()?
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > Regards,
> > > > > > >> > > Jakob
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > 2010/2/17
> baeschtu baeschtu
> > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > > I have two
> myfaces pages
> > > > with a
> > > > > > backing bean each.
> > > > > > >> > > > Both of
> them have a
> > > > spring service
> > > > > > injected to get access to the
> > > > > > >> > > hibernate
> > > > > > >> > > > dao's.
> > > > > > >> > > > They are
> related 1-N
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > So I have
> a
> > > > <f:selectItems>
> > > > > > combobox in one of them served by
> a
> > > > > > >> method
> > > > > > >> > > like
> > > > > > >> > > > this in
> the backinbean.
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > 
>   private
> > > > > > List<Entity> entities;
> > > > > > >> > > > 
>   ..
> > > > > > >> > > > 
>   public
> > > > UISelectItems
> > > > > > getEntityList() {
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > entityList = new UISelectItems();
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > >   entities
> > > > > > = getEntities();
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > >   Object[]
> > > > > > values = new
> Object[entities.size()];
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > >   int
> > > > > > count = 0;
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > >   for
> > > > > > (Entity e : entities) {
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >   values[count] =
> new
> > > > SelectItem(e.getId(),
> > > > > > e.getName());
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >   count++;
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > >   }
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > entityList.setValue(values);
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > >   return
> > > > > > entityList;
> > > > > > >> > > > 
>   }
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > So the
> problem is, when I
> > > > add an
> > > > > > Entity on the other page and
> return
> > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > >> > > the
> > > > > > >> > > > page with
> the combobox.
> > > > The newly
> > > > > > added Entity does not show up in
> > > > > > >> the
> > > > > > >> > > > combobox.
> So I assume I
> > > > get a
> > > > > > cached version from the backing
> bean
> > > > > > >> or
> > > > > > >> > the
> > > > > > >> > > > items are
> still cached in
> > > > the
> > > > > > viewState.
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > thanks
> > > > > > >> > > > Bastian
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to