thanks Richard

I am not using tomahawk.taglib.xml.

All I did was followed instructions to configure web.xml

I tried both org.apache.myfaces.webapp.filter.ExtensionsFilter and 
org.apache.myfaces.component.html.util.ExtensionsFilter with same results

Pls see what I added below:

        <filter>
            <filter-name>extensionsFilter</filter-name>
            
<!--filter-class>org.apache.myfaces.webapp.filter.ExtensionsFilter</filter-class
 -->
                        
<filter-class>org.apache.myfaces.component.html.util.ExtensionsFilter</filter-class>
 
                        </filter>

        <!-- extension mapping for adding <script/>, <link/>, and other 
resource tags
     to JSF-pages
        -->
        <filter-mapping>
          <filter-name>extensionsFilter</filter-name>
          <servlet-name>Faces Servlet</servlet-name>  
        </filter-mapping>

        <!-- extension mapping for serving page-independent resources
                 (javascript, stylesheets, images, etc.)
        -->
        <filter-mapping>
          <filter-name>extensionsFilter</filter-name>
          <url-pattern>/faces/myFacesExtensionResource/*</url-pattern>
        </filter-mapping>


thanks

Ime

--- On Mon, 2/22/10, Richard Yee <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Richard Yee <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Tomahawk not displaying on jsf 2.0
> To: "MyFaces Discussion" <[email protected]>
> Date: Monday, February 22, 2010, 7:51 PM
> If you are using Facelets, you don't
> need JSF 2.0 support. Remove the
> tomahawk.taglib.xml file. See the link I sent earlier. I
> use Tomahawk with
> Facelets and it works fine.
> 
> -Richard
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Ime Asangansi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
> > myfaces 2.0
> > tomahawk 1.1.9
> >
> > and I learnt from Jacob that there's no support for
> myfaces 2.0 yet
> > ...but soon
> >
> > Ime
> >
> > --- On Mon, 2/22/10, Richard Yee <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Richard Yee <[email protected]>
> > > Subject: Re: Tomahawk not displaying on jsf 2.0
> > > To: "MyFaces Discussion" <[email protected]>
> > > Date: Monday, February 22, 2010, 7:30 PM
> >  > Yes. It shows that the tomahawk tags
> > > aren't getting processed which
> > > indicates a configuration problem. What version
> of Tomahawk
> > > are you using?
> > > What version of MyFaces?
> > >
> > > -Richard
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Ime Asangansi
> <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > this is what I find:
> > > >
> > > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML
> 1.0
> > > Transitional//EN" "
> > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";
> > > >
> > > > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xmlns:t="
> > > > http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk";><head>
> > > >     <meta
> > > HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type"
> CONTENT="text/html;charset=UTF-8"
> > > />
> > > > 
>    <title>Calender
> > >
> test</title></head><body><form
> > > id="calendarForm"
> > > > name="calendarForm" method="post"
> > > action="/openhd/visit/test.faces"
> > > >
> enctype="application/x-www-form-urlencoded">
> > > >
> > > >
> > > <t:inputCalendar id="formWithForceIdTrue"
> > > > monthYearRowClass="yearMonthHeader"
> > > weekRowClass="weekHeader"
> > > > popupButtonStyleClass="standard_bold"
> > > currentDayCellClass="currentDayCell"
> > > > renderAsPopup="true"
> popupDateFormat="MM/dd/yyyy"
> > > >
> forceId="true"></t:inputCalendar><input
> > > type="hidden"
> > > > name="calendarForm_SUBMIT" value="1"
> /><input
> > > type="hidden"
> > > > name="javax.faces.ViewState"
> > > id="javax.faces.ViewState"
> > > >
> > >
> >
> value="V55ojcOsiPYqj+yDgqneLhx1Q47ts43T/e8Q6J3Yu5zNJF4NKPAeMtwP8CmZ3PqtxnMHusGEUZ7kO57vHJFpIe8Us4WjgXe4"
> > > > /></form></body>
> > > > </html>
> > > >
> > > > anything suspicious?
> > > >
> > > > Ime
> > > >
> > > > --- On Mon, 2/22/10, Richard Yee <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > From: Richard Yee <[email protected]>
> > > > > Subject: Re: Tomahawk not displaying on
> jsf 2.0
> > > > > To: "MyFaces Discussion" <[email protected]>
> > > > > Date: Monday, February 22, 2010, 7:11
> PM
> > > >  > Have you viewed the source on
> your
> > > > > 'blank' pages? You should look at the
> > > > > source to see if the tags are not
> getting
> > > processed.
> > > > >
> > > > > -R
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Jakob
> Korherr
> > > <[email protected]
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > You're welcome!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Currently the branches for JSF 2.0
> are in
> > > progress.
> > > > > Trinidad already
> > > > > > provides an alpha-2 version for
> JSF 2.0.
> > > However
> > > > > Tomahawk (and I think also
> > > > > > Tobago) does not provide a branch
> for JSF
> > > 2.0 at the
> > > > > moment. But there will
> > > > > > be one for Tomahawk soon.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To get the compatibility
> information you
> > > have to
> > > > > browse the
> > > > > > http://myfaces.apache.org website. There
> > > you will find
> > > > > all the information
> > > > > > you need.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Jakob
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2010/2/22 Ime Asangansi <[email protected]>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > thanks Jakob,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm new to myfaces and just
> trying to
> > > use
> > > > > components that are not in
> > > > > > core.
> > > > > > > For example, I tried to use a
> calendar.
> > > I went
> > > > > through all the stress of
> > > > > > > configuring tomahawk for
> myfaces 2.0
> > > and its not
> > > > > working.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What are the other options?
> does tobago
> > > or
> > > > > trinidad support myfaces 2.0.
> > > > > > > I must say its a bit
> difficult to see
> > > where this
> > > > > compatibility with 2.0
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > written.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks again
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ime
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- On Mon, 2/22/10, Jakob
> Korherr
> > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > From: Jakob Korherr
> <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Tomahawk
> not
> > > displaying on jsf
> > > > > 2.0
> > > > > > > > To: "MyFaces Discussion"
> <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > Date: Monday, February
> 22, 2010,
> > > 6:39 PM
> > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This list is for all
> user
> > > questions about
> > > > > MyFaces stuff
> > > > > > > > (core, tomahawk,
> > > > > > > > trinidad, ext-val,
> ...).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Are you using Trinidad
> or
> > > Tomahawk? You
> > > > > mixed up the
> > > > > > > > systems, I guess.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If you're using
> Tomahawk, I cannot
> > > help you
> > > > > at the moment,
> > > > > > > > because there is
> > > > > > > > no working Tomahawk
> branch for JSF
> > > 2.0 yet,
> > > > > but there will
> > > > > > > > be one soon.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > Jakob
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2010/2/22 Ime Asangansi
> <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'm new here.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Firstly, I am
> wondering if
> > > this list is
> > > > > for the entire
> > > > > > > > myfaces and not only
> > > > > > > > > trinidad.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I have some issue
> with using
> > > trinidad
> > > > > 1.1.9 with
> > > > > > > > myfaces 2.0.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The inputcalendar
> tag doesn't
> > > render
> > > > > and I do not get
> > > > > > > > any error messages. i
> > > > > > > > > have just tried the
> esimple
> > > xample at
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > http://old.nabble.com/-jira--Created:-%28TOMAHAWK-1484%29-t:inputCalendar-as-popup-with-forceId%3D%22false%22-does-not-work-p27406812.html
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > and none of the
> calendars
> > > show.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Pls help
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > thanks
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > Ime
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- On Mon,
> 2/22/10, baeschtu
> > > baeschtu
> > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > From: baeschtu
> baeschtu
> > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re:
> [Trinidad]
> > > Backing
> > > > > Bean Caching
> > > > > > > > issue
> > > > > > > > > > To: "MyFaces
> Discussion"
> > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > > > Date: Monday,
> February
> > > 22, 2010,
> > > > > 4:20 PM
> > > > > > > > > > thanks a lot
> Rene, my
> > > backing
> > > > > bean
> > > > > > > > > > was not in
> request
> > > scope, shame on
> > > > > me.
> > > > > > > > > > :-)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 2010/2/21
> Günther, Rene
> > > - Innflow
> > > > > AG <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I dont
> know much
> > > about that,
> > > > > but your config
> > > > > > > > looks
> > > > > > > > > > uncommon to
> me. In our
> > > > > > > > > > > current
> project we
> > > got
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > <bean
> > > > > id="transactionManager"
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> class="org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateTransactionManager">
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > <property
> > > > > > > > > >
> name="sessionFactory"
> > > > > ref="sessionFactory"/>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > </bean>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > <bean
> > > id="sessionFactory"
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> class="org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.annotation.AnnotationSessionFactoryBean">
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > <property
> > > > > > > > > >
> name="dataSource"
> > > > > ref="dataSource"/>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > <property
> > > > > > > > > >
> name="configLocation"
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> value="classpath:hibernate.cfg.xml"/>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > <property
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > name="hibernateProperties">
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > <value>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > hibernate.dialect=${hibernate.dialect}
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > hibernate.query.substitutions=true
> > > > > 'Y', false
> > > > > > > > 'N'
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> hibernate.cache.use_second_level_cache=true
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> hibernate.cache.provider_class=org.hibernate.cache.EhCacheProvider
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> </value>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > <!-- Turn
> > > > > > > > > > batching off
> for better
> > > error
> > > > > messages under
> > > > > > > > > > >
> PostgreSQL -->
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > <!--
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > hibernate.jdbc.batch_size=0
> > > > > -->
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > </property>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > </bean>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > But maybe
> that
> > > doesn’t help
> > > > > you at all :)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Cheers
> > > > > > > > > > > Rene
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > -----Ursprüngliche
> > > > > Nachricht-----
> > > > > > > > > > > Von:
> baeschtu
> > > baeschtu
> > > > > [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > > > > > > > > Gesendet:
> Sonntag,
> > > 21.
> > > > > Februar 2010 17:21
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > An:
> MyFaces
> > > Discussion
> > > > > > > > > > > Betreff:
> Re:
> > > [Trinidad]
> > > > > Backing Bean Caching
> > > > > > > > issue
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I finally
> got the
> > > custom
> > > > > > > > OpenSessionInViewFilter
> to
> > > > > > > > > > work and I
> could
> > > > > > > > > > > make
> sure
> > > getSession() and
> > > > > closeSession()
> > > > > > > > are called.
> > > > > > > > > > > When
> debugging my
> > > app to
> > > > > figure out why my
> > > > > > > > call to the
> > > > > > > > > > backing bean
> is
> > > > > > > > > > > cached
> I've seen
> > > that the
> > > > > class
> > > > > > > > Cglib2AopProxy is
> > > > > > > > > > involved.
> > > > > > > > > > > So I
> guess my
> > > transaction
> > > > > handling is
> > > > > > > > wrong.
> > > > > > > > > > > I use
> <tx:advice
> > > ..>,
> > > > > > > > <aop:config> for
> my
> > > > > > > > > > service beans
> and tried
> > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > apply
> this config
> > > also to my
> > > > > dao beans.
> > > > > > > > (don't know if
> > > > > > > > > > this is
> > > > > > > > > > >
> necessary) but
> > > still the same
> > > > > problem.
> > > > > > > > > > > I also
> have this
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > <bean
> > > > > > > > id="transactionManager"
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> class="org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateTransactionManager">
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > <property
> > > > > > > > > >
> name="sessionFactory"
> > > > > ref="sessionFactory" />
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > <property
> > > > > > > > > >
> name="dataSource"
> > > ref="dataSource"
> > > > > />
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > </bean>
> > > > > > > > > > > in my
> config.
> > > > > > > > > > > I may be
> on the
> > > wrong path..
> > > > > can someone
> > > > > > > > give me a
> > > > > > > > > > hint in the
> right
> > > > > > > > > > >
> direction?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > thanks
> > > > > > > > > > > Bastian
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> 2010/2/18
> > > "Günther, Rene -
> > > > > Innflow AG"
> > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> Sorry, I am
> > > always
> > > > > using
> > > > > > > > OpenSessionInViewFilter
> > > > > > > > > > but I dont
> know that
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> error
> > > > > > > > > > >> and I
> never
> > > used
> > > > > Trinidad.
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> Cheers
> > > > > > > > > > >> Rene
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > -----Ursprüngliche
> > > > > Nachricht-----
> > > > > > > > > > >> Von:
> baeschtu
> > > baeschtu
> > > > > [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> Gesendet:
> > > Mittwoch, 17.
> > > > > Februar 2010
> > > > > > > > 21:21
> > > > > > > > > > >> An:
> MyFaces
> > > Discussion
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> Betreff: Re:
> > > [Trinidad]
> > > > > Backing Bean
> > > > > > > > Caching
> > > > > > > > > > issue
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >> Also
> > > what
> > > > > session pattern do
> > > > > > > > you use?
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Hibernate_And_MyFaces<
> > > > > > > > > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > myfaces/Hibernate_And_MyFaces>
> > > > > > > > > > >> Yes,
> this may
> > > be the
> > > > > missing part!
> > > > > > > > > > >> I
> tried "One
> > > Session per
> > > > > Request via
> > > > > > > > Servlet
> > > > > > > > > > Filters" but
> when it
> > > comes to
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> extend the
> > > > > OpenSessionInViewFilter I got
> > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > >> "The
> hierarchy
> > > of the
> > > > > type
> > > > > > > > OpenSessionInViewFilter
> > > > > > > > > > is
> inconsistent"
> > > > > > > > > > >> Which
> session
> > > pattern do
> > > > > you recommand
> > > > > > > > for myfaces
> > > > > > > > > > trinidad 1.2.5
> with
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> spring
> > > 2.5.6.SEC01 and
> > > > > hibernate
> > > > > > > > 3.3.2.GA <http://3.3.2.ga/> <http://3.3.2.ga/> <
> > http://3.3.2.ga/>.
> >  > >  > > > > > >
> >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> thanks
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> Bastian
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> PS: I
> checked
> > > that the
> > > > > entity is written
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > mysql.
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> 2010/2/17
> > > "Günther, Rene
> > > > > - Innflow AG"
> > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> Like Jakob
> > > asked
> > > > > already: Are you
> > > > > > > > sure your
> > > > > > > > > > entity is
> saved in your
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> database?
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> After
> > > adding the
> > > > > object from your
> > > > > > > > "add
> > > > > > > > > > object" - page
> can you
> > > look into
> > > > > > > > > > >> the
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> table
> > > directly. Eg.
> > > > > if you use
> > > > > > > > MySQL you
> > > > > > > > > > could check in
> the MySQL
> > > query
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> browser.
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> Also what
> > > session
> > > > > pattern do you
> > > > > > > > use?
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Hibernate_And_MyFaces
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> Cheers
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> Rene
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > -----Ursprüngliche
> > > > > Nachricht-----
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> Von:
> > > baeschtu
> > > > > baeschtu [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> Gesendet:
> > > Mittwoch,
> > > > > 17. Februar
> > > > > > > > 2010 11:43
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> An:
> > > MyFaces
> > > > > Discussion
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> Betreff:
> > > Re:
> > > > > [Trinidad] Backing
> > > > > > > > Bean Caching
> > > > > > > > > > issue
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> I tried
> > > > > query.setCacheable(false);
> > > > > > > > in my dao
> > > > > > > > > > but no
> change.
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> But also
> > > when I try
> > > > > to add the
> > > > > > > > second record,
> > > > > > > > > > I get a:
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >
> > > org.hibernate.NonUniqueObjectException: a
> > > > > > > > > > different
> object with
> > > the same
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> identifier
> > > value was
> > > > > already
> > > > > > > > associated with
> > > > > > > > > > the session:
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> What
> > > confuses me, It
> > > > > works with an
> > > > > > > > other
> > > > > > > > > > entity which
> is
> > > implemented the
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> same way.
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> 2010/2/17
> > > Jakob
> > > > > Korherr <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > Hi,
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > It
> > > seems to me
> > > > > like a
> > > > > > > > hibernate problem.
> > > > > > > > > > Are you sure
> your
> > > entitiy is
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> saved
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > in
> > > your
> > > > > database? Are you
> > > > > > > > refreshing the
> > > > > > > > > > entities from
> the
> > > database
> > > > > > > > > > >> each
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > time
> > > you call
> > > > > getEntities()?
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> >
> > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> >
> > > Jakob
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> >
> > > 2010/2/17
> > > > > baeschtu baeschtu
> > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > I have two
> > > > > myfaces pages
> > > > > > > > with a
> > > > > > > > > > backing bean
> each.
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > Both of
> > > > > them have a
> > > > > > > > spring service
> > > > > > > > > > injected to
> get access
> > > to the
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> >
> > > hibernate
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > dao's.
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > They are
> > > > > related 1-N
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > So I have
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > > <f:selectItems>
> > > > > > > > > > combobox in
> one of them
> > > served by
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> method
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > like
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > this in
> > > > > the backinbean.
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > > >   private
> > > > > > > > > >
> List<Entity>
> > > entities;
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > > >   ..
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > > >   public
> > > > > > > > UISelectItems
> > > > > > > > > >
> getEntityList() {
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > entityList =
> new
> > > UISelectItems();
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > > > > >
> >   entities
> > > > > > > > > > =
> getEntities();
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > > > > >
> >   Object[]
> > > > > > > > > > values = new
> > > > > Object[entities.size()];
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > > > > > >   int
> > > > > > > > > > count = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > > > > > >   for
> > > > > > > > > > (Entity e :
> entities) {
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > >   values[count] =
> > > > > new
> > > > > > > > SelectItem(e.getId(),
> > > > > > > > > > e.getName());
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > >   count++;
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > > > > > >   }
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > entityList.setValue(values);
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > > > > > >   return
> > > > > > > > > > entityList;
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > > >   }
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > So the
> > > > > problem is, when I
> > > > > > > > add an
> > > > > > > > > > Entity on the
> other page
> > > and
> > > > > return
> > > > > > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > the
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > page with
> > > > > the combobox.
> > > > > > > > The newly
> > > > > > > > > > added Entity
> does not
> > > show up in
> > > > > > > > > > >> the
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > combobox.
> > > > > So I assume I
> > > > > > > > get a
> > > > > > > > > > cached version
> from the
> > > backing
> > > > > bean
> > > > > > > > > > >> or
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> the
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > items are
> > > > > still cached in
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > viewState.
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > thanks
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > Bastian
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to