myfaces 2.0 tomahawk 1.1.9 and I learnt from Jacob that there's no support for myfaces 2.0 yet ...but soon
Ime --- On Mon, 2/22/10, Richard Yee <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Richard Yee <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Tomahawk not displaying on jsf 2.0 > To: "MyFaces Discussion" <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, February 22, 2010, 7:30 PM > Yes. It shows that the tomahawk tags > aren't getting processed which > indicates a configuration problem. What version of Tomahawk > are you using? > What version of MyFaces? > > -Richard > > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Ime Asangansi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > this is what I find: > > > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 > Transitional//EN" " > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"; > > > > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xmlns:t=" > > http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk";><head> > > <meta > HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;charset=UTF-8" > /> > > <title>Calender > test</title></head><body><form > id="calendarForm" > > name="calendarForm" method="post" > action="/openhd/visit/test.faces" > > enctype="application/x-www-form-urlencoded"> > > > > > <t:inputCalendar id="formWithForceIdTrue" > > monthYearRowClass="yearMonthHeader" > weekRowClass="weekHeader" > > popupButtonStyleClass="standard_bold" > currentDayCellClass="currentDayCell" > > renderAsPopup="true" popupDateFormat="MM/dd/yyyy" > > forceId="true"></t:inputCalendar><input > type="hidden" > > name="calendarForm_SUBMIT" value="1" /><input > type="hidden" > > name="javax.faces.ViewState" > id="javax.faces.ViewState" > > > value="V55ojcOsiPYqj+yDgqneLhx1Q47ts43T/e8Q6J3Yu5zNJF4NKPAeMtwP8CmZ3PqtxnMHusGEUZ7kO57vHJFpIe8Us4WjgXe4" > > /></form></body> > > </html> > > > > anything suspicious? > > > > Ime > > > > --- On Mon, 2/22/10, Richard Yee <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > From: Richard Yee <[email protected]> > > > Subject: Re: Tomahawk not displaying on jsf 2.0 > > > To: "MyFaces Discussion" <[email protected]> > > > Date: Monday, February 22, 2010, 7:11 PM > > > Have you viewed the source on your > > > 'blank' pages? You should look at the > > > source to see if the tags are not getting > processed. > > > > > > -R > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Jakob Korherr > <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > > > You're welcome! > > > > > > > > Currently the branches for JSF 2.0 are in > progress. > > > Trinidad already > > > > provides an alpha-2 version for JSF 2.0. > However > > > Tomahawk (and I think also > > > > Tobago) does not provide a branch for JSF > 2.0 at the > > > moment. But there will > > > > be one for Tomahawk soon. > > > > > > > > To get the compatibility information you > have to > > > browse the > > > > http://myfaces.apache.org website. There > you will find > > > all the information > > > > you need. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Jakob > > > > > > > > 2010/2/22 Ime Asangansi <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > thanks Jakob, > > > > > > > > > > I'm new to myfaces and just trying to > use > > > components that are not in > > > > core. > > > > > For example, I tried to use a calendar. > I went > > > through all the stress of > > > > > configuring tomahawk for myfaces 2.0 > and its not > > > working. > > > > > > > > > > What are the other options? does tobago > or > > > trinidad support myfaces 2.0. > > > > > I must say its a bit difficult to see > where this > > > compatibility with 2.0 > > > > is > > > > > written. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks again > > > > > > > > > > Ime > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Mon, 2/22/10, Jakob Korherr > <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > From: Jakob Korherr <[email protected]> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Tomahawk not > displaying on jsf > > > 2.0 > > > > > > To: "MyFaces Discussion" <[email protected]> > > > > > > Date: Monday, February 22, 2010, > 6:39 PM > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > This list is for all user > questions about > > > MyFaces stuff > > > > > > (core, tomahawk, > > > > > > trinidad, ext-val, ...). > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you using Trinidad or > Tomahawk? You > > > mixed up the > > > > > > systems, I guess. > > > > > > > > > > > > If you're using Tomahawk, I cannot > help you > > > at the moment, > > > > > > because there is > > > > > > no working Tomahawk branch for JSF > 2.0 yet, > > > but there will > > > > > > be one soon. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Jakob > > > > > > > > > > > > 2010/2/22 Ime Asangansi <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm new here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Firstly, I am wondering if > this list is > > > for the entire > > > > > > myfaces and not only > > > > > > > trinidad. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have some issue with using > trinidad > > > 1.1.9 with > > > > > > myfaces 2.0. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The inputcalendar tag doesn't > render > > > and I do not get > > > > > > any error messages. i > > > > > > > have just tried the esimple > xample at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://old.nabble.com/-jira--Created:-%28TOMAHAWK-1484%29-t:inputCalendar-as-popup-with-forceId%3D%22false%22-does-not-work-p27406812.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and none of the calendars > show. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pls help > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > Ime > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Mon, 2/22/10, baeschtu > baeschtu > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: baeschtu baeschtu > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Trinidad] > Backing > > > Bean Caching > > > > > > issue > > > > > > > > To: "MyFaces Discussion" > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > Date: Monday, February > 22, 2010, > > > 4:20 PM > > > > > > > > thanks a lot Rene, my > backing > > > bean > > > > > > > > was not in request > scope, shame on > > > me. > > > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2010/2/21 Günther, Rene > - Innflow > > > AG <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know much > about that, > > > but your config > > > > > > looks > > > > > > > > uncommon to me. In our > > > > > > > > > current project we > got > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <bean > > > id="transactionManager" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > class="org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateTransactionManager"> > > > > > > > > > > > > <property > > > > > > > > name="sessionFactory" > > > ref="sessionFactory"/> > > > > > > > > > > </bean> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <bean > id="sessionFactory" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > class="org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.annotation.AnnotationSessionFactoryBean"> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <property > > > > > > > > name="dataSource" > > > ref="dataSource"/> > > > > > > > > > > > > <property > > > > > > > > name="configLocation" > > > > > > > > > > > > value="classpath:hibernate.cfg.xml"/> > > > > > > > > > > > > <property > > > > > > > > > name="hibernateProperties"> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <value> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hibernate.dialect=${hibernate.dialect} > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hibernate.query.substitutions=true > > > 'Y', false > > > > > > 'N' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hibernate.cache.use_second_level_cache=true > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hibernate.cache.provider_class=org.hibernate.cache.EhCacheProvider > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > </value> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <!-- Turn > > > > > > > > batching off for better > error > > > messages under > > > > > > > > > PostgreSQL --> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <!-- > > > > > > > > > hibernate.jdbc.batch_size=0 > > > --> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > </property> > > > > > > > > > > </bean> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But maybe that > doesn’t help > > > you at all :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > Rene > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche > > > Nachricht----- > > > > > > > > > Von: baeschtu > baeschtu > > > [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, > 21. > > > Februar 2010 17:21 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > An: MyFaces > Discussion > > > > > > > > > Betreff: Re: > [Trinidad] > > > Backing Bean Caching > > > > > > issue > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I finally got the > custom > > > > > > OpenSessionInViewFilter to > > > > > > > > work and I could > > > > > > > > > make sure > getSession() and > > > closeSession() > > > > > > are called. > > > > > > > > > When debugging my > app to > > > figure out why my > > > > > > call to the > > > > > > > > backing bean is > > > > > > > > > cached I've seen > that the > > > class > > > > > > Cglib2AopProxy is > > > > > > > > involved. > > > > > > > > > So I guess my > transaction > > > handling is > > > > > > wrong. > > > > > > > > > I use <tx:advice > ..>, > > > > > > <aop:config> for my > > > > > > > > service beans and tried > to > > > > > > > > > apply this config > also to my > > > dao beans. > > > > > > (don't know if > > > > > > > > this is > > > > > > > > > necessary) but > still the same > > > problem. > > > > > > > > > I also have this > > > > > > > > > > <bean > > > > > > id="transactionManager" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > class="org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateTransactionManager"> > > > > > > > > > > > > <property > > > > > > > > name="sessionFactory" > > > ref="sessionFactory" /> > > > > > > > > > > > > <property > > > > > > > > name="dataSource" > ref="dataSource" > > > /> > > > > > > > > > > </bean> > > > > > > > > > in my config. > > > > > > > > > I may be on the > wrong path.. > > > can someone > > > > > > give me a > > > > > > > > hint in the right > > > > > > > > > direction? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > Bastian > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2010/2/18 > "Günther, Rene - > > > Innflow AG" > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, I am > always > > > using > > > > > > OpenSessionInViewFilter > > > > > > > > but I dont know that > > > > > > > > >> error > > > > > > > > >> and I never > used > > > Trinidad. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Cheers > > > > > > > > >> Rene > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > -----Ursprüngliche > > > Nachricht----- > > > > > > > > >> Von: baeschtu > baeschtu > > > [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > > > > >> Gesendet: > Mittwoch, 17. > > > Februar 2010 > > > > > > 21:21 > > > > > > > > >> An: MyFaces > Discussion > > > > > > > > > > >> Betreff: Re: > [Trinidad] > > > Backing Bean > > > > > > Caching > > > > > > > > issue > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >> Also > what > > > session pattern do > > > > > > you use? > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Hibernate_And_MyFaces< > > > > > > > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/ > > > > > > > > >> > > > myfaces/Hibernate_And_MyFaces> > > > > > > > > >> Yes, this may > be the > > > missing part! > > > > > > > > >> I tried "One > Session per > > > Request via > > > > > > Servlet > > > > > > > > Filters" but when it > comes to > > > > > > > > >> extend the > > > OpenSessionInViewFilter I got > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > >> "The hierarchy > of the > > > type > > > > > > OpenSessionInViewFilter > > > > > > > > is inconsistent" > > > > > > > > >> Which session > pattern do > > > you recommand > > > > > > for myfaces > > > > > > > > trinidad 1.2.5 with > > > > > > > > >> spring > 2.5.6.SEC01 and > > > hibernate > > > > > > 3.3.2.GA <http://3.3.2.ga/> <http://3.3.2.ga/>. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> thanks > > > > > > > > >> Bastian > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> PS: I checked > that the > > > entity is written > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > mysql. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> 2010/2/17 > "Günther, Rene > > > - Innflow AG" > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > Like Jakob > asked > > > already: Are you > > > > > > sure your > > > > > > > > entity is saved in your > > > > > > > > >> > database? > > > > > > > > >> > After > adding the > > > object from your > > > > > > "add > > > > > > > > object" - page can you > look into > > > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > > > >> > table > directly. Eg. > > > if you use > > > > > > MySQL you > > > > > > > > could check in the MySQL > query > > > > > > > > >> > browser. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > Also what > session > > > pattern do you > > > > > > use? > > > > > > > > >> > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Hibernate_And_MyFaces > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > Cheers > > > > > > > > >> > Rene > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > -----Ursprüngliche > > > Nachricht----- > > > > > > > > >> > Von: > baeschtu > > > baeschtu [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > > > > >> > Gesendet: > Mittwoch, > > > 17. Februar > > > > > > 2010 11:43 > > > > > > > > >> > An: > MyFaces > > > Discussion > > > > > > > > >> > Betreff: > Re: > > > [Trinidad] Backing > > > > > > Bean Caching > > > > > > > > issue > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > I tried > > > query.setCacheable(false); > > > > > > in my dao > > > > > > > > but no change. > > > > > > > > >> > But also > when I try > > > to add the > > > > > > second record, > > > > > > > > I get a: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > org.hibernate.NonUniqueObjectException: a > > > > > > > > different object with > the same > > > > > > > > >> > identifier > value was > > > already > > > > > > associated with > > > > > > > > the session: > > > > > > > > >> > What > confuses me, It > > > works with an > > > > > > other > > > > > > > > entity which is > implemented the > > > > > > > > >> > same way. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > 2010/2/17 > Jakob > > > Korherr <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > Hi, > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > It > seems to me > > > like a > > > > > > hibernate problem. > > > > > > > > Are you sure your > entitiy is > > > > > > > > >> > saved > > > > > > > > >> > > in > your > > > database? Are you > > > > > > refreshing the > > > > > > > > entities from the > database > > > > > > > > >> each > > > > > > > > >> > > time > you call > > > getEntities()? > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > >> > > > Jakob > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > 2010/2/17 > > > baeschtu baeschtu > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > I have two > > > myfaces pages > > > > > > with a > > > > > > > > backing bean each. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Both of > > > them have a > > > > > > spring service > > > > > > > > injected to get access > to the > > > > > > > > >> > > > hibernate > > > > > > > > >> > > > > dao's. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > They are > > > related 1-N > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > So I have > > > a > > > > > > <f:selectItems> > > > > > > > > combobox in one of them > served by > > > a > > > > > > > > >> method > > > > > > > > >> > > like > > > > > > > > >> > > > > this in > > > the backinbean. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > private > > > > > > > > List<Entity> > entities; > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > .. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > public > > > > > > UISelectItems > > > > > > > > getEntityList() { > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > entityList = new > UISelectItems(); > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > entities > > > > > > > > = getEntities(); > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Object[] > > > > > > > > values = new > > > Object[entities.size()]; > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > int > > > > > > > > count = 0; > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > (Entity e : entities) { > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > values[count] = > > > new > > > > > > SelectItem(e.getId(), > > > > > > > > e.getName()); > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > count++; > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > entityList.setValue(values); > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > return > > > > > > > > entityList; > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > So the > > > problem is, when I > > > > > > add an > > > > > > > > Entity on the other page > and > > > return > > > > > > > > >> to > > > > > > > > >> > > the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > page with > > > the combobox. > > > > > > The newly > > > > > > > > added Entity does not > show up in > > > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > combobox. > > > So I assume I > > > > > > get a > > > > > > > > cached version from the > backing > > > bean > > > > > > > > >> or > > > > > > > > >> > the > > > > > > > > >> > > > > items are > > > still cached in > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > viewState. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Bastian > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
