Well, I think one of the principal problem is that there is not much documentation on Trinidad's internals... it's quite difficult to create a new renderkit if you don't know how to do it. And yes, community it's not very active on Trinidad's development... just see 1.0.x branch is being abandoned...
Regards, -- Rafa 2011/3/4 Scott O'Bryan <[email protected]>: > Yeah, makes total sense. I mean heck, Trinidad's extendability and > plugability are second to none in that regard. > > I know I, for one, would lobe to see an new/enhanced renderkit to beef up > the Trinidad system and it's been talked about several times about having a > series off "Additional" renderkits added, but nobody's actually buckled down > and done it. ;) > > If there are any takers, by all means I can provide some infrastructure for > you to do all your work. > > On Mar 4, 2011, at 10:07 AM, Walter Mourão <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Scott > > When I first started with Trinidad, before the thing moved over to >> Apache, the AJAX was still using iframes instead of >> HttpServletRequest. :) >> > > me too! > > I mean as far as Rich Renderkits go, Trinidad was one of the >> earliest. Many other renderkits got to take advantage of newer >> technologies. >> > > Yes... maybe that's the point: what about creating a new render kit using > JQuery (for example) ? Trinidad has rock solid back end and, the same way > there is a pda render kit, it could exist a JQuery render kit. Does it make > sense ? > > > Walter Mourão > http://waltermourao.com.br > http://arcadian.com.br > http://oriens.com.br > > > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Scott O'Bryan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Maybe. I mean as far as Rich Renderkits go, Trinidad was one of the >> earliest. Many other renderkits got to take advantage of newer >> technologies. >> >> When I first started with Trinidad, before the thing moved over to >> Apache, the AJAX was still using iframes instead of >> HttpServletRequest. :) >> >> On Mar 4, 2011, at 6:24 AM, Dominik Dorn <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > It's maybe that people want fancy JQuery/Javascript components like >> > those used everywhere else >> > on the web and primefaces has those (its basically just a wrapper around >> em). >> > >> > >> > 2011/3/4 Walter Mourão <[email protected]>: >> >>> >> >>> Is this because of the commercial backing of the other two? >> >> >> >> >> >> I don't think so... as far as I know there are companies offering >> Trinidad >> >> support/consulting (Irian <http://www.irian.at/trinidad_support/>, for >> >> example). Not sure about the level of commitment of these companies. >> >> >> >> Walter Mourão >> >> http://waltermourao.com.br >> >> http://arcadian.com.br >> >> http://oriens.com.br >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:49 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> I've had similar concerns. until recently there hadn't been any >> apparent >> >>> movement in Trinidad development. Is this because of the commercial >> backing >> >>> of the other two? >> >>> >> >>> On Mar 4, 2011 5:53am, Walter Mourão <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Hi folks, >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> I'ma happy Trinidad user, so far, but I'ma bit worried about its >> future. >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> I'm seeing the evolution of Icefaces, Richfaces and (mainly) >> Primefaces >> >>>> and >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> I feel like Trinidad isn't going with the same pace. >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> Am I right ? What do you think ? >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Walter Mourão >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> http://waltermourao.com.br >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> http://arcadian.com.br >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> http://oriens.com.br >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Dominik Dorn >> > http://dominikdorn.com >> > http://twitter.com/domdorn >> > >> > Tausche Deine Lernunterlagen auf http://www.studyguru.eu ! >> >
