Hi,

I don't know why, but this is happening now more frequently. Where should I
look into to find the root cause?

Thanks,
Manish

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Manish G <manish.gg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Joe,
>
> Thanks for the quick reply. Yes, the processor keeps running on a single
> thread (even after stopping). And the number remains there even after
> stopping.
> Today, it happened on my customized putHDFS processor. Only thing
> different in this processor is - I have added an additional attribute that
> tells if the processor created the directory while loading the file on
> HDFS. I don't think this should be the issue though.
>
> Regards,
> Manish
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Manish
>>
>> When it is stuck do you see a number in the top right corner of the
>> processor?  When you stop it does the number remain?  That number is
>> telling you how many threads are still executing.  Which processor are
>> we talking about?  When it is in the stuck state can you please run
>> bin/nifi.sh dump.  If you can then share the nifi-bootstrap.log that
>> would aid us in narrowing in on a possible cause.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Joe
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Manish G <manish.gg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I have noticed that sometime a flow file gets stuck on a processor for a
>> > very long time for no reason and then I can not even stop the processor
>> to
>> > look at the flow flow file from queue. If I click on stop, then
>> processor
>> > goes into a state where I cannot start/stop the processor.
>> >
>> > On restarting the NiFi, the file gets processed successfully and routed
>> to
>> > success queue. I checked in App log, but everything seems to be normal
>> for
>> > the flow file. I don't see anything mysterious in provenance too (except
>> > that queue time is in hours).
>> >
>> > Has anyone else faced a similar issue? What else should I check to
>> identify
>> > the root cause for this?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Manish
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> *With Warm Regards,*
> *Manish*
>



-- 


*With Warm Regards,*
*Manish*

Reply via email to