My apologies, the link I sent in my last message [1] may not be
accessible unless you are signed into Jira. If you cannot view that
link, see [2].
[2] 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316020&version=12345213

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:18 PM Kevin Doran <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> For what it's worth, v1.9.2 is going to include a number of bug fixes
> in addition to NIFI-6150. While the other bugs are not nearly as
> critical (depending on your usage of NiFi), all the more the reason to
> upgrade to 1.9.2 rather than patching a 1.9.1 install. For a full list
> of what's been included in the RC for 1.9.2 so far, see [1]:
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NIFI/versions/12345213
>
> Cheers,
> Kevin
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:04 PM William Gosse
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > "Although I'm not sure why that would be preferred over getting the 
> > officially released fix in 1.9.2" - I don't prefer applying a patch but I 
> > do have some systems already setup with 1.9.1. I'll probably bite the 
> > bullet and moved to 1.9.2 as soon as its available.  We are in the process 
> > of containerizing nifi with docker so hopefully  that will make moving to a 
> > newer release not a big deal.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bryan Bende <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 12:25 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: NiFi 1.9.1 release contains a bug causing content repos to 
> > fill...
> >
> > [CAUTION: This email originated from outside of Kodak Alaris. Do not click 
> > links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the 
> > content is safe.] ________________________________
> >
> > The associated JIRA is NIFI-6150 [1] and it leads to the content repo not 
> > properly cleaning up and eventually filling up disks.
> >
> > There will be a 1.9.2 release to address this. Of course you are free to 
> > take the patch for the fix [2], apply it to the 1.9.1 release tag [3], and 
> > build your own fix, although I'm not sure why that would be preferred over 
> > getting the officially released fix in 1.9.2.
> >
> > [1] 
> > https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttps-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_NIFI-2D6150%26d%3DDwIFaQ%26c%3DskUQKLuTFULvQUMqV0uyBaBvPxsA7Wk8MKjvMTLjY3w%26r%3DWm89MSTpkAcFFP1M0uvGefI8slyO_VIaIza2IJwAlsU%26m%3DIcEOLvLqMRwVGHZrj8MeEuGvHHj6WxiOyETFetIDgS8%26s%3D26O4gEjALxwRdlVmLjatxiCTiApEi5UN76no-9D--yQ%26e&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cwilliam.gosse%40aifoundry.com%7C65f8067fa3cf41f6eb6e08d6b78b241d%7Cd29b7a9b6edb472099a83c5c6c3eeeb0%7C0%7C0%7C636898205580491866&amp;sdata=emHvuWSerL0yVKRSam5metw3KBFYCphFpI%2BlHEpfmOc%3D&amp;reserved=0=
> > [2] 
> > https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttps-3A__patch-2Ddiff.githubusercontent.com_raw_apache_nifi_pull_3391.patch%26d%3DDwIFaQ%26c%3DskUQKLuTFULvQUMqV0uyBaBvPxsA7Wk8MKjvMTLjY3w%26r%3DWm89MSTpkAcFFP1M0uvGefI8slyO_VIaIza2IJwAlsU%26m%3DIcEOLvLqMRwVGHZrj8MeEuGvHHj6WxiOyETFetIDgS8%26s%3D2_4CR7XulBNmfR2MlPlDcdTgKD6NIiP6S_u8YG17qO0%26e&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cwilliam.gosse%40aifoundry.com%7C65f8067fa3cf41f6eb6e08d6b78b241d%7Cd29b7a9b6edb472099a83c5c6c3eeeb0%7C0%7C0%7C636898205580491866&amp;sdata=dFHMeTTGT%2FwzbfoPBizqRUJ1dMXhoGS2Q1d%2F3v%2FOBx8%3D&amp;reserved=0=
> > [3] 
> > https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttps-3A__github.com_apache_nifi_tree_rel_nifi-2D1.9.1%26d%3DDwIFaQ%26c%3DskUQKLuTFULvQUMqV0uyBaBvPxsA7Wk8MKjvMTLjY3w%26r%3DWm89MSTpkAcFFP1M0uvGefI8slyO_VIaIza2IJwAlsU%26m%3DIcEOLvLqMRwVGHZrj8MeEuGvHHj6WxiOyETFetIDgS8%26s%3DVP_sGtxIOZIh_pm1wipeONZ6l1i3G5epzYUT_J_K2dk%26e&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cwilliam.gosse%40aifoundry.com%7C65f8067fa3cf41f6eb6e08d6b78b241d%7Cd29b7a9b6edb472099a83c5c6c3eeeb0%7C0%7C0%7C636898205580491866&amp;sdata=9B2wS%2FXeHsS9U02A72CKE4MWcr9mQXXY2LIGnFD8ME0%3D&amp;reserved=0=
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 12:17 PM William Gosse <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Also can someone explain more what this issue is and how serious it is.
> > >
> > > Can a patch be made available to fix this issue for  existing 1.9.1 
> > > installations?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Joe Witt <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2019 12:32 PM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: NiFi 1.9.1 release contains a bug causing content repos to 
> > > fill...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [CAUTION: This email originated from outside of Kodak Alaris. Do not
> > > click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and
> > > know the content is safe.]
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > mathieu
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > just a matter of finding the chunk of time to knock it out.  perhaps this 
> > > evening.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019, 11:27 AM Louis-Ferdinand, Mathieu 
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Joe,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Do you have an idea of the timeline for 1.9.2 RC?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Mathieu.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Joe Witt [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 11:00 AM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: NiFi 1.9.1 release contains a bug causing content repos to 
> > > fill...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > We will work to promptly produce an Apache NiFi 1.9.2 release which will 
> > > correct a regression introduced in the 1.9.1 release.  The issue, 
> > > NIFI-6150 has been identified and fixed on master and once further 
> > > testing confirms we're good we'll get the RC going.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I've updated the release guide to discourage use of 1.9.1 until the fix 
> > > is out.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Joe
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > NOTICE: Morgan Stanley is not acting as a municipal advisor and the 
> > > opinions or views contained herein are not intended to be, and do not 
> > > constitute, advice within the meaning of Section 975 of the Dodd-Frank 
> > > Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. If you have received this 
> > > communication in error, please destroy all electronic and paper copies 
> > > and notify the sender immediately. Mistransmission is not intended to 
> > > waive confidentiality or privilege. Morgan Stanley reserves the right, to 
> > > the extent required and/or permitted under applicable law, to monitor 
> > > electronic communications, including telephone calls with Morgan Stanley 
> > > personnel. This message is subject to the Morgan Stanley General 
> > > Disclaimers available at the following link: 
> > > https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttp-3A__www.morganstanley.com_disclaimers%26d%3DDwIFaQ%26c%3DskUQKLuTFULvQUMqV0uyBaBvPxsA7Wk8MKjvMTLjY3w%26r%3DWm89MSTpkAcFFP1M0uvGefI8slyO_VIaIza2IJwAlsU%26m%3DIcEOLvLqMRwVGHZrj8MeEuGvHHj6WxiOyETFetIDgS8%26s%3D5uma0Jh97GhlqQ5opQicKFR9FLMXxKuVPLE281ShF1w%26e&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cwilliam.gosse%40aifoundry.com%7C65f8067fa3cf41f6eb6e08d6b78b241d%7Cd29b7a9b6edb472099a83c5c6c3eeeb0%7C0%7C0%7C636898205580491866&amp;sdata=%2F5H6GhMvNspNOtp%2Fhmot2CzTWNIk6LBppxv%2FwvFL4BQ%3D&amp;reserved=0=.
> > >   If you cannot access the links, please notify us by reply message and 
> > > we will send the contents to you. By communicating with Morgan Stanley 
> > > you acknowledge that you have read, understand and consent, (where 
> > > applicable), to the foregoing and the Morgan Stanley General Disclaimers.

Reply via email to