Hi Josef, There is a PR made by Mark takes care of this behaviour: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/7095
I hope this will fit to your needs! If there is something is going unexpected, please reply! Regards, Bence > On 2023. Mar 28., at 9:14, Simon Bence <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Josef, > > I will take a look as soon as I will have the chance and find you back. > > Regards, > Bence > >> On 2023. Mar 28., at 8:44, [email protected] wrote: >> >> Hi Bence >> >> We still facing problems with the current NiFi v1.20.0 release and nested >> process groups. Would you mind having a look at the issue? >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-11251 >> >> It seems that NiFi is not correctly stopping/starting the processors within >> the (nested?) PGs. As workaround we always stop the processors, do the NiFi >> registry update and start the processors again. Very annoying as we have >> HTTP listeners which stop answering in that period. >> >> Cheers Josef >> >> >> From: Zahner Josef, GSB-LR-TRW-LI <[email protected]> >> Date: Tuesday, 13 December 2022 at 13:53 >> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: NiFi 1.19.1 Registry Nested Process Groups - Show Local Changes >> issue >> >> Hi Bence >> >> I mentioned yesterday another issue which we thought would be solved after >> the upgrade steps. Sadly it happened again and after an investigation on our >> side it seems to be fully reproducible, I’ve opened a Jira Bugticket >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-10973 with more details. It’s as >> well related to NiFi Registry nested flows… >> >> Thanks for taking care of it :-). >> >> Cheers Josef >> >> >> From: Simon Bence <[email protected]> >> Reply to: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Date: Monday, 12 December 2022 at 16:40 >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: NiFi 1.19.1 Registry Nested Process Groups - Show Local Changes >> issue >> >> Hi Josef, >> >> Thanks for the quick update! Meanwhile I tried to reproduce this situation >> but based on the known facts I was not able (Note: without any version >> change). I think it is connected to the version change indeed, but if you >> face with this ever again, please let me know! >> >> Regards, >> Bence >> >> >> >> On 2022. Dec 12., at 16:33, <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Ok quick update on this. We investigated the changes on the *.snapshot files >> on NiFi Registry. It seems that it’s mainly caused due to the fact that the >> NiFi Version changes from 1.18.0 to 1.19.1 and some other facts caused due >> to the upgrade. After commiting all the child PGs once the “Show Local >> Changes” seems to behave as expected. >> We have seen another issue caused only on the first commit of the child PGs >> on v1.19.1, however I’ll not mention them as I’m guessing that this is >> highly related to the last commits with the older NiFi version. >> >> Cheers Josef >> >> >> From: "Zahner Josef, GSB-LR-TRW-LI" <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> >> Date: Monday, 12 December 2022 at 14:44 >> To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> Subject: NiFi 1.19.1 Registry Nested Process Groups - Show Local Changes >> issue >> >> Hi guys >> >> Sorry that I’ve to bother you again. We just upgraded to NiFi 1.19.1 due to >> the major issues with the NiFi Registry Client on NiFi 1.18.0. >> >> The following issue still persists in the new version. Let’s say everything >> is up-to-date (parent and child PGs) from NiFi Registry perspective, now I >> do change eg. a label directly in the parent PG. I do see on that parent PG, >> that most likely every connection/service/processor has changed, even though >> I’ve changed only one single label size, please check the screenshot for >> NiFi Registry Client under “Show Local Changes”. >> >> <image001.png> >> >> Is this a cosmetical issue or do we have to worry about that (we had massive >> NiFi registry issue on NiFi 1.18.0) ? Because in theory it makes no sense to >> that NiFi tells that everything has changed if only one label changes. >> >> Thanks in advance >> Josef >
