On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 09:08 -0500, Douglas Frank wrote: > :-) I agree it's lame, or seems that way to this newbie. Perhaps if I > knew the reason for kprinter's existence, I'd feel differently. > > On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 17:40 -0600, Jim Wagner wrote: > > There _must_ be a better way to make things run than by suggesting to > > people, "Oh, if you can't make OO print, send your stuff through kprinter."
Lame? I have never had any problem using the default printer in either windows or Linux. Even when I was forced to switch from using LPRng to CUPS. Thus I can only conclude that you have not setup your print subsystem to properly translate postscript to whatever your printer needs. Using kprinter as a workaround does work but I would recommend that you review your setup so that OOo can use the default. -- Documentation Co-Lead PLEASE - keep list traffic on the list. Email sent directly to me may be ignored utterly. "Dinna meddle wi' things ye ken nuthin' aboot!" J.Herriot --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
