I'm not sure, but I assumed this was to show the list that somebody
responded to the post so others wouldn't have to.
Joe
Doug Thompson wrote:
Perhaps the answer is obvious to everyone but me.
If it is suspected the person (OP) may not have seen a reply on the
list because they aren't subscribed, how does one conclude the OP will
see some additional response and that it is reasonable to clutter the
list with these posts?
I suggest it would be more useful to reply directly *ONLY* to the OP
and not copy the list. </rant>
Doug
XXX wrote:
On Friday 18 March 2005 18:47, + so-and-so wrote:
[ MODERATED ] ***********************
Dear Sir,
-----------8<-------Blah bla(snip)----------
Regards
As you are not subscribed you may not have seen that:
------8<---snip-snip-snip-snip-snip-------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
A wise man doubts often, and changes his mind, while a fool Knows all things
but his own ignorance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
