Web Kracked wrote:
> James Knott wrote:
>> Web Kracked wrote:
>>> Hello Wes Sir;
>>>
>>> As a person that is/was required to have MS Office to do his client
>>> work, I can safely say that over 99% of the things that I had to do
>>> using MS Office, I now do with OpenOffice.org.  I currently use version
>>> 3.0.1, but I have used it for many years.  I was using 1.x till 2.x
>>> came
>>> out and then upgraded to 3.0.0 this past October.
>>>
>>> The one "funny" thing I have found is that OOo 3.x.x reads the .docx
>>> format better than MS Word 2003 with the MS file format compatibility
>>> pack add on.  I encourage everyone to not use the .docx format and
>>> stick
>>> with the more standardize .doc format.  That said, I encourage everyone
>>> I deal with to not Use MS Office and switch to the FREE alternatives
>>> that
>>> is OpenOffice.org.
>>
>> I wonder how well MS Office, with Sun ODF plugin, compares with how well
>> OpenOffice works with ODF files?  Also, there are many other apps that
>> support ODF, particularly in the Linux/Unix world.
>>
>
> I have tired the ODF plugin for MS Office, but it is not that good.
> Compared to using OOo, or MS with the ODF plugin, I choose OOo
> everytime.
>
> If you only have MS Office and need to use ODF, then it is "ok", but
> not a great solution.  Does not work well, but it is better than
> nothing.
>

That's what I expected.  Like you, I use OpenOffice, including at work. 
However, my work computer also has Office XP and I installed the Sun ODF
plugin, so that should there ever be a need for me to use MS Office,
some ODF support is there.

-- 
Use OpenOffice.org <http://www.openoffice.org>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to