> Mmm... I disagree. Offering a solution that's mainly point and click in > Ooo.org will illustrate how little one needs to be a geek to use > Ooo.org. It requires very little effort from the writer of the article. > And it prevents the author (who's probably not familiar with Ooo.org) > from finding an over-complicated solution that would make Ooo.org look > complicated. >
I think that it prevents the author from taking a look at OOo. Instead of asking him a question, and possibly encouraging him to look into OOo, you are giving him an answer to a question that nobody asked. What will he do with that? > Offering the author an additional content item on his/her website/blog > about this item in Ooo.org will also increase traffic to their site If you give him one item, then he has one more page. If you interest him in OOo, then he will have hundreds of new pages. I think that there is an expression about teaching a man to fish that is relevant here. > (it's called "third party content" and is an enrichment for a site). > Not only will search results on "create TOC ms word" lead them to their > page, but also "create TOC openoffice writer" - thus increasing the > visitors to their site (what many bloggers apparently seem to want) > If you want to write all that author's OOo content, be my guest. My intention was to get him to take an interest in OOo and write about it, not to have him publish your writings. -- Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com http://gibberish.co.il א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת ا-ب-ت-ث-ج-ح-خ-د-ذ-ر-ز-س-ش-ص-ض-ط-ظ-ع-غ-ف-ق-ك-ل-م-ن-ه-و-ي А-Б-В-Г-Д-Е-Ё-Ж-З-И-Й-К-Л-М-Н-О-П-Р-С-Т-У-Ф-Х-Ц-Ч-Ш-Щ-Ъ-Ы-Ь-Э-Ю-Я а-б-в-г-д-е-ё-ж-з-и-й-к-л-м-н-о-п-р-с-т-у-ф-х-ц-ч-ш-щ-ъ-ы-ь-э-ю-я ä-ö-ü-ß-Ä-Ö-Ü --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
