> > Mmm... I disagree. Offering a solution that's mainly point and click in > > Ooo.org will illustrate how little one needs to be a geek to use > > Ooo.org. It requires very little effort from the writer of the article. > > And it prevents the author (who's probably not familiar with Ooo.org) > > from finding an over-complicated solution that would make Ooo.org look > > complicated. > > > > I think that it prevents the author from taking a look at OOo. Instead > of asking him a question, and possibly encouraging him to look into > OOo, you are giving him an answer to a question that nobody asked. > What will he do with that? >
...or it may be the author presumed the task was either complex or not possible in OOo. Giving one answer that reveals a misconception may lead them to question other preconceptions, seek their own answers and possibly start writing about what they begin to discover in OOo.
