2010/1/31 NoOp <[email protected]>

> On 01/31/2010 09:04 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> ...
> >>
> >> Is it a GPL violation ? Is there something to do against ?
> > OpenOffice.org is not GPL but LGPL
> > (http://www.openoffice.org/license.html). So you have the right to sell
> OOo.
> > But it is clear for me that this site, located in Chile, violate the
> > brand OpenOffice.org and abuse of the logo. Sun legal has been alerted
> > some months ago.
> >
> > Regards.
> > JBF
> >
>
> It's the same guy/company that was running <openoffice2009.com>,
> <openoffice-gratuit.com>, <openoffice09fr.com>, <openoffice-fr.com>,
> <openoffice-pt.com>, <openoffice-pl.com>, and <openoffice-nl.com>
>
> Those domains are now owned by Sun Microsystems:
> http://domains.adrforum.com/domains/decisions/1293581.htm
> <quote>
> FINDINGS
>
> Complainant, Sun Microsystems, Inc., markets and sells computer
> hardware, computer software, network computing equipment, and related
> services.  Complainant has used the OPENOFFICE.ORG mark in connection
> with computer software and related goods and services.  Complainant
> holds multiple trademark registrations with the United States Patent and
> Trademark Office (“USPTO”) for its OPENOFFICE.ORG (Reg. No. 3,063,339
> issued February 28, 2006).
>
> Respondent registered the <openoffice2009.com>,
> <openoffice-gratuit.com>, <openoffice09fr.com>, <openoffice-fr.com>,
> <openoffice-pt.com>, <openoffice-pl.com>, and <openoffice-nl.com> domain
> names no earlier than August 18, 2009.  The disputed domain names all
> resolve to similar websites in different languages.  The resolving
> websites contain information about Complainant’s computer software and
> offer a free software download.  When an Internet user clicks to
> download the software, a pop-up ad appears requiring the Internet user
> to send a text message to receive a code to download the software.
> Respondent receives a fee from the text.
> ...
> DECISION
>
> Having established all three elements required under the ICANN Policy,
> the Panel concludes that relief shall be GRANTED.
>
> Accordingly, it is Ordered that the <openoffice2009.com>,
> <openoffice-gratuit.com>, <openoffice09fr.com>, <openoffice-fr.com>,
> <openoffice-pt.com>, <openoffice-pl.com>, and <openoffice-nl.com> domain
> names be TRANSFERRED from Respondent to Complainant.
> </quote>
>
> It's good to see Sun going after these guys.
>

Agree with NoOp ! Thanks for checking this out, Jean-Baptiste !...

Henri

Reply via email to