On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 05:24:18PM +0100, James Wilde wrote:
>
..........snip...........
> Good point, Marco, and the first really rational - as opposed to religious -
> justification for bottom-posting. My own position is when in Rome do as the
> Romans. If I find that the general rule is bottom-posting I bottom-post out
> of courtesy and live with the inevitable persons who don't trim hard before
> posting. 90% of what goes on in here I delete on the basis of the subject
> line. But if nothing is said, then I top-post because this is without doubt
> the Internet norm. And as someone pointed out, most emails are short and
> (should) contain only one point, and it's just as easy to read a top-post as
> a bottom-post. I think the example was an exchange about a lunch date.Top posting is the internet norm? Since when? I think you have that backwards. P.S. Check your line wrapping. -- Bob Holtzman Key ID: 8D549279 "If you think you're getting free lunch, check the price of the beer"
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
