On 8/25/2010 4:16 PM, Carlo Strata wrote:
Il 25/08/2010 17:43, Barbara Duprey ha scritto:
On 8/25/2010 8:52 AM, Carlo Strata wrote:
Il 24/08/2010 05:35, Gail Severin ha scritto:
Where is the bar code for envelopes addresses in Word? I really need the
bar codes option. If there is none on this program that I have, can an
update be created adding that option? Thanks. Gail Severin
[email protected]
Hi Gail,
many answer to you only in the mailing list so that you didn't receive
and read their useful answer, so subscribe this list for the future
and/or browse directly here:
http://www.openoffice.org/mail_list.html#general
and here for your thread (this one)
http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/BrowseList?list=users&by=thread&from=2405760
<snip>
The main problem with an unsubscribed user trying to use the OOo archive
is that it is not conversational. If a question is asked for clarifying
a problem, so a better answer can be provided, the unsub would really
have to copy the question into a new e-mail, add the response, and then
send the message to the list (messing up threading). Also, this response
will continue to need moderation, adding the delay time into the
process. Using the list's thread command allows natural response, but
still has the delay, and subject line changes break the thread. So far,
the best technique I've seen is to use old.nabble.com (or Gmane, but
that seems more complicated); the first reply will require the unsub to
confirm the e-mail address is active, but thereafter their messages will
be "injected" and not need any moderation. Still far from ideal,
primarily because OOo has no control. I'm hoping that the Kenai
implementation will solve this whole issue!
Hi Barbara,
A first good step would be to change "[moderated]" to, e.g., "[non sub]" or "[non subscriber]",
and leave the "[moderated]" flag with his correct mean also if unused at this moment. Isn't it?
Carlo
The [moderated] tag *always* means the poster is not subscribed, and that's its only meaning, so
that would not really add any information. And it does nothing for the majority of the unsubs, who
write directly to the list and don't go through the path where that tag is attached. What I think
really should happen is that when an unsubscribed user posts, they should be given an option to
receive any updates to their thread (like what happens when you file an issue), and their subsequent
posts should be treated as if from a subscriber without their getting the full list e-mails -- which
many find overwhelming. That would put the responsibility on them, and none of us would ever have to
know whether they were actually subscribed or not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
