Joel Wiramu Pauling skryf om 10:50 PM op 12/08/2005: > > Oh I see what you mean. Well, no offence intended an' all, and in my > > very humble opinion, PGP signing is a gimmick or a toy employed by > > paranoid souls and wannabe geeks in an attempt to ensure secure e-mail > > communication....
> Signing has a few advantages. > > Say for instance I was submitting a diff patchset or sending a file. If > I sign the e-mail message it's easy for the person committing that file > to check to see if the patch has been altered. > > It's not just for the paranoid, and it's certainly not a gimick. Hmm, I apologise being so harsh. There are much easier ways to ensure that a file sent was unaltered, but this is not the place to discuss it. Instead, I Googled for the OP's problem but I must say I'm baffled how signing an e-mail using PGP can render the e-mail illegible to the recipient using Outlook2003 on XP. Samuel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
