Hello!
In message to <[email protected]> sent Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:33:48 -0500
you wrote:
SP>> here are four tests I've just done:
SP>>
SP>> 1. Delete TOC and recreate it on the file that was already converted
SP>> by OO 2.0. New TOC is incorrect. 2. Delete TOC from the file converted
SP>> by OO 2.0. Save the file. Reload it and recreate TOC. New TOC is also
SP>> incorrect. 3. I have also tried something I'd prefer not to do as I've
SP>> been working on the file in question for about one day using OO 2.0
SP>> before I've found out that TOC was incorrect and this way I'd loose
SP>> all of the changes. Delete TOC using OO 1.1.4 on the old sxw file.
SP>> Save it. Load using OO 2.0, convert to odt and recreate TOC. The
SP>> result is still the same - new TOC lacks all "Contents 1". 4. I have
SP>> also tried to recreate TOC as at (3) using OO 2.0, but without saving
SP>> the document as odt and the result is also the same. Yes, I have
SP>> tested ExtendedPDF without any positive results. I'm not sure if those
SP>> tests were done on that file, but it's possible. If that's a known
SP>> problem are there any known ways of fixing the file?
SP>> From another message, you said you were creating the headers on the
SP>> fly.
What do you mean by creating headers on the fly?
I am creating headers by writing line of text, selecting it and clicking
"header 1" (or 2) from menu available after clicking F11.
GRS> TOC generation actually works better if the headers, items et cetera
GRS> exist before attempting to generate any index.
I have created TOC when some of the document was already present, but it was
modified later. Some of the headers were deleted or modified, some were
added. TOC worked fine with OO 1.1.4.
Additional note:
I've found a way to make OO 1.1.4 fail with TOC.
a) Get "test.sxw" from url I've posted a few mails ago.
b) Load it using OO 1.1.4, update TOC and verify it's OK.
c) Load the file using OO 2.0.
d) Update TOC - it is incorrect then.
e) Save the file as test2.sxw (yes, in 1.0 format).
f) Load test2.sxw using OO 1.1.4.
g) Update TOC using OO 1.1.4 - it is _incorrect_ now. Save changes.
I hope somebody who knows internals of sxw format could understand what's
the problem from differencies beetween test.sxw and test2.sxw after those
operations.
Sławomir Piotrowski
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
