On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 22:58:55 +0100, Slawek wrote: > Hello! > In message to <[email protected]> sent Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:33:48 -0500 > you wrote: > > SP>> here are four tests I've just done: SP>> > SP>> 1. Delete TOC and recreate it on the file that was already converted > SP>> by OO 2.0. New TOC is incorrect. 2. Delete TOC from the file > converted SP>> by OO 2.0. Save the file. Reload it and recreate TOC. New > TOC is also SP>> incorrect. 3. I have also tried something I'd prefer not > to do as I've SP>> been working on the file in question for about one day > using OO 2.0 SP>> before I've found out that TOC was incorrect and this > way I'd loose SP>> all of the changes. Delete TOC using OO 1.1.4 on the > old sxw file. SP>> Save it. Load using OO 2.0, convert to odt and > recreate TOC. The SP>> result is still the same - new TOC lacks all > "Contents 1". 4. I have SP>> also tried to recreate TOC as at (3) using > OO 2.0, but without saving SP>> the document as odt and the result is > also the same. Yes, I have SP>> tested ExtendedPDF without any positive > results. I'm not sure if those SP>> tests were done on that file, but > it's possible. If that's a known SP>> problem are there any known ways of > fixing the file? > > SP>> From another message, you said you were creating the headers on the > SP>> fly. > > What do you mean by creating headers on the fly? > > I am creating headers by writing line of text, selecting it and clicking > "header 1" (or 2) from menu available after clicking F11. > > > GRS> TOC generation actually works better if the headers, items et cetera > GRS> exist before attempting to generate any index. > > I have created TOC when some of the document was already present, but it > was modified later. Some of the headers were deleted or modified, some > were added. TOC worked fine with OO 1.1.4. > > > > Additional note: > > I've found a way to make OO 1.1.4 fail with TOC. a) Get "test.sxw" from > url I've posted a few mails ago. b) Load it using OO 1.1.4, update TOC and > verify it's OK. c) Load the file using OO 2.0. > d) Update TOC - it is incorrect then. e) Save the file as test2.sxw (yes, > in 1.0 format). f) Load test2.sxw using OO 1.1.4. > g) Update TOC using OO 1.1.4 - it is _incorrect_ now. Save changes. > > I hope somebody who knows internals of sxw format could understand what's > the problem from differencies beetween test.sxw and test2.sxw after those > operations. > > > > Sławomir Piotrowski
I managed to get the file. Earlier, I asked if you had the headings set. When I looked, I found that you only had Heading 2 in the list plus some others. This means that NO Heading 1 will appear in your TOC. Please fix your outline levels and try again. -- Documentation Co-lead "Dinna meddle wi' things ye ken nuthin' aboot!" J.H. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
