From: JC Helary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 23:03:24 +0900

   > >> NeoOffice is OpenOffice.org.
   > >
   > > No.
   > 
   > ??? NeoOffice1.2=OOo 1.1.5 on OSX what are you trying to say by "no" ?

No means no. Neo is a program which is based on OpenOffice.org source
code. As well as Sun StarOffice is based on it.

   > > But they are not the same! If they are the same, they can share the  code
   > > mutually. This is not the case.
   > 
   > This is the case.

No this is not the case. If you do not know the reason, it is nonsense to
reply to my mails, really.

   > It looks like you are a little confused by what "the same app" means.
   > OOo for OSX is not OOo for Windows which is not OOo for Linux.

Thanks for explanation. I do not think it is needed, I feel quite educated
after several years of regular (almost daily) building of OpenOffice.org on
GNU/Linux, Windows, Mac OS X, FreeBSD and Solaris/SPARC and providing
community builds of OpenOffice.org for ~40 languages.

Looks like you are thinking about the binaries. I do not care about
binaries. I care about source code, the core of the program.

   > they all have code difference based on the platform they are ported to
   > and based on the GUI framework they use.

Sure. And now look in the OpenOffice.org CVS - do you see all of Neo code
there? I unfortunately not - and I'm not blind! But I see all of
OpenOffice.org code there. Can you reproduce the same using your eyes?
I also do not see all Sun StarOffice source code there as well.

   > OpenDocument is supported from OOo1.1.5 and 1.1.5 was released  
   > because 2.0 was becoming late. NeoOffice uses OOo1.1.5 without the  
   > X11 GUI dependancies. And thus supports OpenDocument at the exact  
   > same level as OOo1.1.5 does.

So it can't write OD. As OpenOffice.org in the current version CAN write
OD, consider it demonstrated they Neo is not OOo. QED

   > > Chad: I have never heard you telling that OpenOffice.org is the same
   > > as Neo.
   > 
   > Well, maybe I can say it then. OOo 1.1.5 is the same as NeoOffice
   > 1.1.5 as far as the office suite is concerned.

Good - we are now getting to the key point of this discussions! I can agree
with you on this!

   > Maybe Chad is over-simplifying sometimes, but it seems to me _you_ are
   > them one who is sending inflamatory mails.

Because you do not understand my points (or maybe I can't describe them
very well because of the language barrier).

   > Which is exactly what is occuring now and I can assure you that
   > developers on either side could make without people like you who make
   > a useless fuss on open lists. Your claim that OOo and NeoOffice are
   > different is just as ridiculous as if somebody claimed that StarOffice
   > and OOo are different.

And they are different! Read it again: they are different. Ask Sun people!
OOo doesn't yet support patch mechanism. StarOffice does -> consider it
demonstrated that Star Office and OpenOffice.org are different! QED
-- 
Pavel Janík

Proving me wrong is always a good sport ;)
                  -- Linus Torvalds in linux-kernel

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to