Joe,
Not really any kind of reliable "benchmark", but just in case you
need reference:
I had a 7mb Word file, I opened it in both OOo and NO, added the same
sentence on the firts line, saved as ODT for OOo and SXW for NO and
my impressions are:
OOo is faster for menu access, it takes some time to get "physical"
access to the menu in NO (but I suspect is is also because I was also
using a memory intensive Java app simultaneously in the background)
As far as saving modifications into their native format, I had
similar values of about 30 secs.
FWIW.
JC
On 2006/03/07, at 10:22, JC Helary wrote:
Joe,
As Ross wrote, you need more RAM than CPU clock here.
As for OOo vs NeoOffice, I use both and I don't find much
difference. And as I wrote earlier, I work with very big, quite
heavily formatted files.
My machine is an old PowerBook G4 with 768MB RAM and a 667MHz CPU.
So, if you think RAM is an issue on your machine quit other
applications, clean up your HD and make room for swap memory, you
should see some performance improvements.
Jean-Christophe
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
