On 23/02/07, James Knott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Apparently, even setting the default browser to Firefox or other doesn't
always work.  In the recent Iowa MS trial, a tech setting up internet
access for the lawyers found that out the hard way.  Even though he had
set Firefox as default, somehow IE became default and it took a lot of
effort to change back.  This happened right in front of the court that
was handling the MS antitrust case!

I hadn't heard about that. Interesting. On systems that I've worked
with (friends systems, and a few university machines) I have had no
problem setting Firefox as the default browser.

Incidentally, this problem with IE being tied so close to the operating
system is the result of another MS lawsuit over forced bundling of IE.
MS claimed it had to be there, as it was part of the OS and sure enough,
when the next version of Windows appeared, it was.  So MS deliberately
did that, in violation of good software engineering practices, solely to
back up a claim made in court.  The world has been suffering for it ever
since.

I'm pretty sure that IE was bundled with Windows ever since version 3,
in 98SE. They did that to screw Spyglass out of the licensing fees for
mosaic. Read about it here:
http://what-is-what.com/what_is/internet_explorer.html

Disclaimer: my site.

You can thank MS for doing the above for much of the security problems
with Windows.  You don't have anywhere near that level of risk with
anything else.  For example, there has never been a viable virus for
Linux.  I don't recall any for OS/2 either.

Thats because other systems:
a) have a clear line drawn between user apps and system apps. The
former cannot alter the latter
b) enforce and encourage the usage of the machine for everyday tasks
as a non-root (administrator) account.

How does this relate to Open Office? It doesn't, so the discussion is
off-topic for the OOo-users list. I recommend interested parties
research Thunderbird, Firefox, Linux, and other open source
alternatives to proprietary software. Security-wise, open source apps
have a much better security record than proprietary apps. I'm not
saying that because I am an advocate of open source. Rather, I am an
advocate of open source because it is true.

Dotan Cohen

http://lyricslist.com/lyrics/artist_albums/570/69_boyz.html
http://what-is-what.com/what_is/protocol.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to