On Sunday 27 May 2007, jonathon wrote: > NoOp wrote: > > But from recollection I think that you can do just > > about anything (and more) in OOo that you can in MS > > Publisher. > > MSPublisher has one major advantage over OOo. > MSPublisher can open files in MSPublisher format. > OOo can not open files in MSPublisher format. > > if OOo could open .pub files,then OOo is more than > adequate for anything produced using MSPublisher.
Nothing but MSpublisher can open .pub files any way. He isn't talking about being able to open .pub files in OOo. He is talking about producing files with OOo instead of MSpublisher. He is trying to get people to look more closely at OOo first instead of going to a real DTP if they don't need too. He is claiming that OOo can do just about anything that MSpublisher can do. So, what advantage does MSpublisher have over OOo? -- Registered Linux User 342662 http://counter.li.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
