How are we going to convince people without a background in computer science to try OOo, if at the same time we dismiss them as «Joe Sixpack[s]» ? This is not merely a question of careless terminology, but of one's attitude toward others....
Henri 2007/5/27, jonathon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mathias Bauer wrote: >> into their own container, with the current implementation of >> OOo.In the long term, this would be a more secure option. > It's easy. The IDE has an export function that can create Basic > libraries or Basic extensions with some mouse clicks. Of course the > macros in the extension are not more "safe" than those in the document, > but the separation perhaps makes it more clear and helps users to > understand. What I was thinking of was a save function/option that created some_document_name.odf and some_document_name.macros. some_document_name.macro contains only the macros that are used with the document. I'm thinking of Joe Sixpack here, who doesn't know what an IDE is, much less how to use it. >> format, converting it to ODF in the process. With your >> proposal that macro could not run. > It could be run either as part of an extension or if the macro in the > document is digitally signed. A digitally signed macro can change the content of the document. A macro that has not been digitally signed can not change the content. That might work. > think different. I think you know that one of the most popular OOo > macros is still deployed as a document - OOoDic. So is OOoFont. > out it shows that the demand for document macros is still there. Both of those macros ( OOoDic & OOoFont ) provide required functionality for OOo. [FWIW, I wouldn't be surprised to see OOo_Install_Grammar_Checking as well. This is a macro that installs and configures Grammar Checkers.] The issue is whether such tools should be hard coded into OOo, or soft-codes with macros. Other "special instances" would be prototyping vertical market applications for OOo. > The unbundling wouldn't cause a lot of coding in OOo. And why should it > require changes in ODF? Macros are not part of ODF. Somewhere in the ODF specifications is a note on how to handle macros. Unbundling macros from the document would require the specifications to change to exclude the possibility of macros being part of the document. xan jonathon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 老朽 頓首 M Henri Day, PhD, MD Stadshagsvägen 22, 5tr S-112 50 Stockholm SUÈDE Tel : +46 8 6183098 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype/Google Talk : mhenriday http://mhenriday.googlepages.com http://mhenriday.blogspot.com/
