On Fri, August 31, 2007 9:17 am, Frank Cox wrote:
>> But, now I've just found out how DIRTY M$ is in doing their business.
> This is news?
>
> Actually, I really fail to see the reason for all of the outrage and fur
> flying around this issue.
>
> I don't use and have no use for MS software.
> ...
> I know little about what MS does, and I care substantially less than that.
> ...Their actions are irrelevant, in my humble opinion.

Sorry, but this is a very myopic and dangerous attitude.

File formats are the only real reason why the Microsoft monopoly still
exists. Closed or not documented file formats are a terribly stupid
and dangerous idea no matter who creates them.

File formats are alphabets. software programs are pens. As long as only
free as in freedom alphabets are used, it doesn't really matter if the
pens are free or not.

It doesn't matter if you or I personally have no use for MS _software_
today. Allowing another proprietary format, created on purpose to lock
information in, to be labeled "acceptable for use by Public
Administrations" (because this is what ISO ratification practically
means) is equivalent to:

- allowing that all the public digital documents paid with people money
  and containing data which must always remain completely available,
  actually are available only as long as one private company exists and
  is satisfied with how much you can pay them

- forcing all the small and big businesses which sell any good or service
  to those PAs to use OpenXML, that is the whole MS stack, if they want
  to stay in business. Forcing everybody else, over time, to do the same

- and so on and so forth

allowing a proprietary format to be labeled as "acceptable for use by Public
Administrations" or, if it will be approved, tolerating that Public
Administrations use or require it, is an economical, cultural and ethical
disaster. For a bit of perspective, you may want to read:

http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8616
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8727
and the slideshow " How file formats can be used to favour (or hamper)
innovation" from  http://old.opendocumentfellowship.org/Articles/Index

Tolerating OpenXML is a very, very bad thing. Even if you are still free,
for the moment, to not care at all about propietary software

    Marco
-- 
What *every* family should know about Free Standards and Software:
http://digifreedom.net

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to