> > 2007/12/11, Alan Boba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Seconding Dan's primary key suggestion. I had tables I couldn't edit on > > both > > Linux and Windows XP Pro "for no reason" until I found that not having a > > primary key is reason enough for Base not to enable editing. Once > primary > > keys were created editing became available for the previously > troublesome > > tables on both platforms. > > > > On 12/12/07, Guy Voets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
maybe that's why they're called primary? Maybe so but for someone weaned on dBase, Paradox and Access not being able to edit a table simply because it doesn't have a primary key, or any key for that matter, is quite a change!
