Now what does less secure mean to Microsoft, anyway. If Microsoft wants to put the boot right where the Lord (or Judge Jackson) should have split it, that's fine by me. Far be it from me to protect an idiot from his own consequences. But objectively, how do you even think this is a good idea. We've seen posts where people are asking about Microsoft Works, Lotus 1-2-3, etc, etc. Playing devil's advocate for a second, though: if you're files are in that format and you've converted to Microsoft, shouldn't you have converted them a long time ago? At the very least if they are finished documents, print them out to PDF and store those. I'm not letting Microsoft off the hook here, but it almost seems like you're still trying to read manuscripts in Latin during the 21st century. Fred A. Miller wrote: > Upgrade to MS Office 2003 Locks Older File Types > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Microsoft has found itself between a rock and a hard place with its > latest Microsoft Office 2003 Service Pack 3. The Redmond, Wash., > software giant released SP3 in September, and in doing so blocked the > ability of MS Office 2003 users to easily access older, less secure file > formats. > > See the Full Story: > http://www.technewsworld.com/story/61047.html >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
