jonathon wrote:
> Donald wrote:
> 
> 
>> additional bits.  Why do it in the written form?  Those who need the context
>> (which is nearly no one)
> 
> You obviously have never received 2,500 emails on a day in which you
> marked on your calender as "no email today".
> 
> When you get to the point that you can consider 2,500 emails to be the
> equivelant of not receiving any email that day, you will realize that
> context is crucial, and hunting for the context is a massive time
> waster.
> 
>> easily as those who know the context can search for the beginning of reply 
>> posted near the bottom of a missive.
> 
> You've obviously never had the misfortune of having to figure out what
> the two line top posted comment, to 50,000 lines of quoted messages
> was referring to.

I have had a "rule" for a long time......if it's top posted, I don't
read it. I don't have time to waste. Simple.

Fred

-- 
Liberal ideology and political correctness, infused with
public policy, begets social insanity. - Michael Savage

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to