On Wed, January 23, 2008 3:00 pm, James Knott wrote: > I ignore those discussions, as they often turn into flame wars, so I > didn't see any such agreement. Care to post it?
Search the threads "The right way to recognize and manage unsubscribed users" "To moderators and all volunteers of OOo users list" "Updating vague or obsolete subject lines" started around jan 4th. No, sorry, I'm not going to spend hours again on this to pin out all and only the messages expressing agreement on the fact that replying to a subjectless message without giving a proper subject is bad, or to demonstrate that there were none or almost no disagreement on this. I't not my fault if you didn't care to figure out if you were involved the first time. Not to mention that I also sent you and others a private suggestion to not send subjectless replies. > Perhaps the proper method is to fix the web site, so that a user cannot > submit the problem, until a subject has been entered. See the comment above. This, too, has been beaten to death in those thread, please let's not make a rerun. > Also, I've noticed not everyone here agrees with you. Please see my answer to Donald: as a matter of fact, what I'm suggesting you to do is nothing more than respecting the official guidelines of this list, which were there way before I subscribed. Marco -- Help *everybody* love Free Standards and Software: http://digifreedom.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
