On 15/03/2008, Dallas Talley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Openofficeorg is wonderful. One thing that hasn't been addressed yet is
> quick, and convenient, accessibility of those using screen readers.I looked
> in a lot of places on the site, and fouond nothing, as yet, about this. I've
> only used the writer so far, and that not much, because it wasn't easy to
> read all in the menu choices. It was a hit and miss effort.
>
> I'm trying to recall the web accessibility standard, something like, WTC3,
> but it relates to the worldwide standard of accessibility for screen
> readers. Has this been address as yet, without me noticing?
>
> I'd like to help test, if it hasn't, and recommend improvements, if there
> are any to be made, once I know what I'll be giving my time too.
> Dallas B Talley
> 3606931259

Dallas, almost nobody read your message because it was a reply to an
already-established thread. When you want to ask a question on a
mailing list, you must open a new message, address it to the list, and
write a descriptive subject line. Only then will many list members
read your mail.

Dotan Cohen

http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

Reply via email to